1 Trending: Iran War Aside, Here Are Two Very Good Things Trump Is Doing Domestically

2 Trending: When California Republicans Run Against Democrats, They’re Running Against The Government

3 Trending: Trump’s Plan To Pull U.S. Troops From Europe Is Good For Everyone, And America Most Of All

4 Trending: This Covid Mandates Case Would Let Alito Prove The Left Doesn’t Care About Bodily Autonomy

Fulton County Fights Federal Subpoena For Records About Botched 2020 Election

The Fulton County Election Board is playing the victim card as the federal government begins a long-overdue accountability effort.

Share Article on Facebook

Share Article on Twitter

Share Article on Truth Social

Share Article via Email

Fulton County, Georgia — the epicenter of so many lingering questions about the 2020 presidential election — has a new problem on its hands. On May 4, 2026, the Fulton County Board of Registration and Elections filed a 27-page motion to quash in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia asking a federal judge to quash a grand jury subpoena demanding the personal identifying information of thousands of county election workers and volunteers who helped administer the November 2020 General Election.

The original subpoena was issued under seal on April 17, 2026, by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of North Carolina under U.S. Attorney Dan Bishop. It was served on the board around April 20 and required production of records by May 5. It seeks names, positions/functions, residential addresses, email addresses, and personal telephone numbers for essentially the entire 2020 Fulton election workforce.

The categories are explicit and granular — they want the identities of mail-in ballot reviewers, Voter Review Panel members, mobile voting unit operators, ballot transporters, precinct managers, tabulator operators, risk-limiting audit participants, recount workers, and more. Of note, the records were not even directed to the grand jury in Atlanta; they were to be delivered to an out-of-district prosecutor and an FBI special agent.

Rather than comply quietly, the board filed its motion to quash publicly — without requesting it be sealed. That single procedural choice, which some see as very deliberate, turned an otherwise sealed grand jury matter into front-page news overnight. The board’s lawyers wasted no time in framing the subpoena in the most explosive terms possible, characterizing it as “the DOJ’s latest effort to target and harass the President’s perceived political enemies.” They called it “unprecedented and harassing,” “grossly overbroad,”........

© The Federalist