menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

Employment experts agree: Telework is a protected right

13 0
24.02.2026

Sign Up Account Profile Log Out

Newsletters Morning Report 12:30 Report Evening Report Business Defense Health Care Technology Newsletter Energy & Environment Whole Hog Politics The Gavel The Movement

Technology Newsletter

NEWS Senate House Administration Courts Future America Media Campaign News Education In The Know Latino LGBTQ DC News Race & Politics State Watch Print Edition People in the News

POLICY Defense Health Care Energy & Environment Technology Transportation International Cybersecurity National Security Space Sustainability

BUSINESS Budget Taxes Personal Finance Lobbying

OPINION Columnists Congress Blog All Contributors Opinions – Campaign Opinions – Civil Rights Opinions – Criminal Justice Opinions – Cybersecurity Opinions – Education Opinions – Energy and Environment Opinions – Finance Opinions – Healthcare Opinions – Immigration Opinions – International Opinions – Judiciary Opinions – National Security Opinions – Technology Opinions – White House Submit Opinion Content

All Contributors Opinions – Campaign Opinions – Civil Rights Opinions – Criminal Justice Opinions – Cybersecurity Opinions – Education Opinions – Energy and Environment Opinions – Finance Opinions – Healthcare Opinions – Immigration Opinions – International Opinions – Judiciary Opinions – National Security Opinions – Technology Opinions – White House

Opinions – Civil Rights

Opinions – Criminal Justice

Opinions – Cybersecurity

Opinions – Energy and Environment

Opinions – Healthcare

Opinions – Immigration

Opinions – International

Opinions – National Security

Opinions – Technology

Opinions – White House

Submit Opinion Content

EVENTS Upcoming Events About

Sign Up Account Profile Log Out

Supreme Court tariffs

Content from Google Cloud

Opinion Employment experts agree: Telework is a protected right Opinions - White House | 2 minutes ago

US women’s gold medal-winning hockey team declines Trump State of the Union invitation Administration | 9 minutes ago

Opinion Colbert and Talarico show the easiest way to promote speech is to suppress it Opinions - Civil Rights | 32 minutes ago

Senate Democrats unveil proposal to discourage private equity ownership of homes Senate | 40 minutes ago

Live updates: Trump ready to tout busy first year in State of the Union Administration | 51 minutes ago

US imposes 10 percent tariff after Trump promises 15 percent rate Administration | 57 minutes ago

Opinion In monster snowstorms or blistering heat, workers need protection Opinions - Energy and Environment | 1 hour ago

The Movement: How anti-MAGA Republicans are plotting to take back the party The Movement | 1 hour ago

Employment experts agree: Telework is a protected right

President Trump’s January 2025 memorandum delivered a blunt operational directive: End broad remote work in the federal government and restore full-time, in-person duty stations. 

Although many leaders treated it as a fast lane back to 2019 norms, employees who use telework as a disability accommodation read it as a civil rights test, because their workday depends on more than convenience.  

In the absence of detailed guidance, many agencies delayed and denied telework requests for those with disabilities, despite the widespread use of such accommodations previously. This resulted in labor conflicts and lawsuits.

That tension sat unresolved until recently, when the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission published federal guidance that tightened the legal and practical limits around any sweeping return-to-office push. 

But the big surprise came from the institution itself. Observers expected the new Trump-appointed Republican majority to clear a path for aggressive telework rollbacks as part of Trump’s management agenda. Instead, the EEOC issued a technical assistance document that forced compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act.  

The core guidance, packaged as telework accommodation FAQs, told agencies to avoid one-size-fits-all decisions and to handle accommodation requests through individualized analysis. The U.S. Office of Personnel Management distributed the same material in a public “frequently asked questions” document, reinforcing that the message came through formal channels and, importantly, positioning compliance as part of executing the president’s directive rather than resisting it.

The president’s memorandum itself offered the legal hook. It directed agencies to terminate remote work “as soon as practicable” while also requiring implementation consistent with applicable law. The implementation guidance repeated the same constraint, reminding agencies that exemptions remain available.

Federal disability rights flow through the Rehabilitation Act. The Office of Personnel Management accommodation framework places a compliance burden on agencies to evaluate and implement effective adjustments such as telework, which enables qualified employees to perform essential duties. The 2026 guidance emphasizes that agencies can choose among effective accommodations when multiple options work, while also stressing that some situations require telework because it serves as the effective route to performance. 

For professional leaders, the practical implication stands out: Return-to-office policy can move quickly, but accommodation decisions require casework. A mass rescission of recurring telework arrangements creates legal exposure when it skips individualized review, as well as creates operational chaos because it forces late-stage reversals after employees plan care schedules, transportation and medical routines. The EEOC-Office of Personnel Management guidance even acknowledges the managerial burden and urges agencies to manage changes in a way that reduces disruption, a subtle nod to the real cost of rushed reversals. 

Private-sector litigation shows why this stance carries weight beyond federal agencies.  

The EEOC brings cases where remote work aligns with job reality and disability need. For example, the agency sued a contractor for denying remote work to an employee after serious medical events. The complaint’s logic reflects a simple management truth: When duties center on electronic systems and customer communication, physical presence often functions as a preference rather than a job requirement, and prior remote success becomes powerful evidence.

Courts also validate employers when they prove that in-person presence ties to essential functions. An Eleventh Circuit dispute involving a dispatcher ended with the employer prevailing, based on how the role operated and what the employer demonstrated about operational needs. Together, these outcomes reinforce the EEOC’s central point: success in telework disputes depends on role-specific facts, documented expectations, and a credible interactive process. 

The timing also intersects with measurable labor-market change. An analysis by the Society for Human Resource Management reported that labor-force participation among people with disabilities reached record levels in the pandemic era, thanks in part to remote and flexible work. Leaders who treat telework accommodations as a compliance afterthought risk shrinking their talent pool, especially in knowledge roles where productivity frequently depends on tools, focus, and workflow design rather than a specific chair.  

What the EEOC guidance shows is that agencies can pursue in-person culture and operational speed while honoring disability rights. That balance offers a blueprint for every employer trying to bring people into the office back while keeping trust, compliance and performance intact. 

Gleb Tsipursky, Ph.D., serves as the CEO of the hybrid work consultancy Disaster Avoidance Experts and authored the best-seller “Returning to the Office and Leading Hybrid and Remote Teams.” 

Copyright 2026 Nexstar Media Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

More Opinions - White House News

Gorsuch takes aim at fellow Supreme Court justices in tariff decision

Hegseth says he’ll order random pizzas to throw off monitoring app

France bars US ambassador Kushner from meeting government officials  

White House plays hardball with Democrats over DHS shutdown

Democratic leaders scrambling to prevent repeat of last year’s rowdy State of ...

GOP set for internal battle over Supreme Court tariff ruling

Senate Democrat: Trump has ‘no intention of following’ Constitution on ...

Republicans eye opening for DHS deal this week as Democrats double down

State Department receives hundreds of calls on 24/7 crisis hotline for US ...

GOP members call on Tony Gonzales to resign over alleged affair

Here’s how Trump’s polling has changed since last year

Democrats prepare to protest Trump State of the Union: What to know

Trump puts Iran’s leader in double bind: Capitulation or risk of war

Trump aims to flex political muscle in State of the Union

Senate Democrats unveil Trump tariffs refund legislation

Texas GOP Senate candidate: ‘It’s time for the next generation of American ...

US imposes 10 percent tariff after Trump promises 15 percent rate

Trump administration ending collections on tariffs deemed illegal

The Hill Podcasts – Morning Report

2024 Election Results

2024 Election Forecast

Regulation - Administration

Energy & Environment Video Clips

Health Care Video Clips

Technology Video Clips

Transportation Video Clips

International Video Clips

Cybersecurity Video Clips

National Security Video Clips

Contributors to The Hill

Submit Opinion Content

PRIVACY POLICY 09/30/2025

Advertise with Nexstar

Journalistic Integrity

THE HILL 400 N CAPITOL STREET NW, SUITE 650 WASHINGTON DC 20002

© 1998 - 2026 Nexstar Media Inc. | All Rights Reserved.

Provided by Nexstar Media Group, Inc.

Sign in to create a free account. No password needed.

By clicking on any of the sign up options below, you confirm that you have read and agree to our Terms of Use, which includes a jury trial waiver and class action waiver, and that you have read our Privacy Policy detailing our collection, use and sharing of your personal information.

By clicking on any of the sign up options below, you confirm that you have read and agree to our Terms of Use, which includes a jury trial waiver and class action waiver, and that you have read our Privacy Policy detailing our collection, use and sharing of your personal information.

The Hill is provided by Nexstar Media Group, Inc., and uses the My Nexstar sign-in, which works across our media network.

Learn more at nexstar.tv/privacy-policy.

The Hill is provided by Nexstar Media Group, Inc., and uses the My Nexstar sign-in, which works across our media network.

Nexstar Media Group, Inc. is a leading, diversified media company that produces and distributes engaging local and national news, sports, and entertainment content across its television and digital platforms. The My Nexstar sign-in works across the Nexstar network—including The CW, NewsNation, The Hill, and more. Learn more at nexstar.tv/privacy-policy.

Provided by Nexstar Media Group, Inc.

Check your email inbox

Provided by Nexstar Media Group, Inc.

Thanks for registering!

Provided by Nexstar Media Group, Inc.

Are you sure you want to log out?


© The Hill