1 Trending: If SCOTUS Upholds ‘Birthright Citizenship,’ It Will Do So At Its Own Peril

2 Trending: Judges Toss Dems’ Attempt To Redraw Wisconsin’s Congressional Maps

3 Trending: The Federalist Scored A Huge Win For Free Speech — And Exposed More Of The Censorship-Industrial Complex

4 Trending: Trust The Gender Science, Says SCOTUS Justice Who Doesn’t Know What A Woman Is

Leading Ethics Journal Floats Forced Abortion For Minors

Forced abortion is what a culture of death has now wrought, and a leading academic journal thought the proposal worth publishing.

Share Article on Facebook

Share Article on Twitter

Share Article on Truth Social

Share Article via Email

Pro-abortion rhetoric has long rested on a slick focus group-tested “pro-choice” mantra, which claims that abortion is necessary for women to have “bodily autonomy.” But pro-abortion “ethicists” are now asserting that “justice for girls” demands that all underage pregnancies end in the death of the unborn child — even if it requires physically or chemically subduing the mother against her will.

That is precisely the case made in a new essay in the April edition of Ethics, the University of Chicago’s elite philosophy journal. Across 31 full pages, our two authors, Alyssa Izatt, a Ph.D. candidate at the University of British Columbia, and Kimberley Brownlee, her UBC professor, explain why compulsory abortion is essential for feminine justice. In fact, in two places they explain enforcing this upon objecting females “might then require sedation or physical restraint” even though it “could be traumatizing,” but still, “the use of restraint (chemical or physical) … is justified as a last resort when it is necessary to provide adequate care.” By “adequate care,” of course, the writers mean killing the mother’s preborn child.

You heard that right. Good-bye, “My body, my choice!” Hello, “Do as you’re told, honey!” Leftist patriarchy parading as feminist empowerment. The pro-abortion ethic........

© The Federalist