1 Trending: 47 Republicans Are Pushing Amnesty For Illegal Alien Agriculture Workers

2 Trending: ‘Dark-Money’ Abortion Drug Dealer Hub Referred To Trump DOJ For Criminal Investigation

3 Trending: Hawaii’s Supreme Court Declares War On SCOTUS

4 Trending: Planned Parenthood Ramps Up Child Vivisection Thanks To More Tax Dollars From GOP Congress

How Congress Can Fix SCOTUS’s Disastrous Birthplace Citizenship Error

Sen. Jim Banks has offered a text-and-precedent-bound response to a decision his opponents assumed had ended the debate.

Share Article on Facebook

Share Article on Twitter

Share Article on Truth Social

Share Article via Email

When the Supreme Court decided Trump v. Barbara on June 30, 2026, opponents of birthplace-citizenship reform declared the fight over. But that disappointing decision was not the end of attempts to reform the system. It was merely the “end of the beginning.” Sen. Jim Banks read Barbara as a legislative map. His new Citizenship Act follows the road Wong Kim Ark charted.

Barbara held that President Trump’s executive order was unconstitutional by locking in birthplace citizenship’s definition from a much older case. That 1898 case, United States v. Wong Kim Ark, laid out three categories of people whose children are not automatically citizens even if born on American soil. Barbara held the executive order was unconstitutional for going outside those three categories. But within those three categories, any needed fix need only be by statute. That means Congress can pass a fix.

Banks could have taken the easy way out, either reading Barbara as a loss or arguing any fix must be constitutional — and thus impossible in today’s polarized age. Instead, he took the harder path: legislating within the four corners of precedent. If the Supreme Court says birthplace citizenship is governed by Wong Kim Ark, then Wong Kim Ark’s own exceptions are fair game.

Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote a separate opinion explaining that while he agreed with the majority’s result, it would not require a constitutional amendment to change the law to deny birthplace citizenship to more people than just the three categories flagged in Wong Kim Ark. This law fits within Kavanaugh’s conception — and may be enough to pull another justice from the majority, too.

👀That was fast. @SenatorBanks read Justice Kavanaugh's concurrence in the Birthright Citizenship case closely. The Supreme Court's Wong Kim Ark said 3 categories of people don't get citizenship. One is children of invaders. So he's introducing a law labeling illegals invaders pic.twitter.com/zXUizLqG8K— Eric W. (@EWess92) July 13, 2026

👀That was fast. @SenatorBanks read Justice Kavanaugh's concurrence in the Birthright Citizenship case closely. The Supreme Court's Wong Kim Ark said 3 categories of people don't get citizenship. One is children of invaders. So he's introducing a law labeling illegals invaders pic.twitter.com/zXUizLqG8K

Understanding why........

© The Federalist