Silence has always been one of antisemitism’s most reliable allies. It rarely announces itself loudly at first. Instead, it creeps in—through excuses, selective outrage, and the quiet calculation that speaking up might come at a political cost.

What makes it especially dangerous today is not just the presence of antisemitism—but who chooses not to confront it.

Across the political spectrum, leaders, commentators, and institutions too often hesitate. Not because they fail to recognize hatred—but because calling it out would mean challenging their own side. That is where moral clarity begins to erode.

Universities have become one of the clearest stages for this failure.

When leaders like Claudine Gay of Harvard University, Liz Magill of University of Pennsylvania, and Sally Kornbluth of Massachusetts Institute of Technology were asked whether calls for genocide against Jews violated campus policy, their answers were widely criticized as legalistic and conditional. Instead of drawing a clear moral line, they deferred to context, nuance, and procedure.

That moment was not just about policy—it exposed something deeper: a reluctance to speak plainly when the implications are uncomfortable.

And........

© The Times of Israel (Blogs)