There comes a point when a country’s crisis is no longer confined to budget tables, policy speeches, or televised debates. It is felt in the daily irritation of citizens waiting in queues, in the exhaustion of businesses working through uncertainty, in the anxiety of young people wondering whether effort still leads anywhere, and in the quiet lowering of expectations inside ordinary homes. Pakistan’s deepest problem is not that it is governed badly from time to time. It is that bad governance has become familiar. Institutions exist, but too often without vitality. Public debate is noisy, but delivery remains thin. Those who demand sacrifice rarely begin with themselves, while citizens are asked, again and again, to pay for a system that does not serve them well enough. Countries rarely fail because of one dramatic blow. More often, they lose the habit of renewal. They create institutions without accountability, rules without enforcement, and slogans without results. Decline is what happens when the same evasions are repeated so often that they begin to look normal.

The literature of decline has long warned against mistaking surface power for renewal. Oswald Spengler, in The Decline of the West, saw civilisations as organisms that pass from creative culture into rigid, overmanaged civilisation. Edward Gibbon’s account of Rome placed weight on the loss of civic virtue and the weakening of internal discipline, as much as on external assault. Arnold Toynbee argued that societies rise when they respond creatively to challenge and break down when their leading minorities cease to inspire voluntary loyalty. Ibn Khaldun, centuries earlier, described the decay of asabiyyah; the social cohesion that binds a ruling order together as prosperity hardens........

© The Friday Times