menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

Here Are The Key Takeaways From SCOTUS’ Monday Decisions

19 0
30.06.2026

1 Trending: Gorsuch Skewers SCOTUS For Ducking Covid Shot Mandate Case

2 Trending: California Races To Neuter An Office That A Conservative Might Win

3 Trending: New Study: Immigration Caused 40% Of Your Rent Hikes Over 10 Years

4 Trending: Daughters Of The American Revolution Betrays Its Mission By Rejecting Resolution To Keep Its Ranks Female

Here Are The Key Takeaways From SCOTUS’ Monday Decisions

Of the three political opinions issued by SCOTUS on Monday, the Trump v. Slaughter case will have the greatest effect.

Share Article on Facebook

Share Article on Twitter

Share Article on Truth Social

Share Article via Email

On Monday, the United States Supreme Court issued four decisions which, along with the opinions being released Tuesday, will wrap up the Court’s 2025-26 term. While on paper it looked like a bad day for Trump, the Administration’s win in the Slaughter case — wherein the Supreme Court held the president held absolute removal authority over agencies that exercise executive powers — far surpasses the narrow setbacks in the other cases.

Here are the key holdings and ramifications from the three politically tinged cases, beginning first with Trump’s huge victory.

In Trump v. Slaughter, the Supreme Court addressed the constitutionality of Congress’ “for cause” removal statute for members of the Federal Trade Commission. Former FTC Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter had sued President Trump after he removed her from the FTC even though her five-year appointment was not due to expire until 2029. Slaughter argued that Trump lacked the authority to remove her from the FTC because Congress provided that commissioners could only be removed  for “inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office,” and Trump instead removed her because he believed her “continued service on the FTC” was inconsistent with his administration’s priorities.

The Supreme Court in Slaughter held that the congressionally created for-cause “protection from removal is contrary to the separation of powers enshrined in the Constitution.” Specifically, the majority held that the “text, history, and structure” of the Constitution establish that by vesting “the Executive power” in “a President” of the United States, the Constitution grants the president the power to “remove his subordinates........

© The Federalist