menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

Same-Sex Couple Sues Surrogate After She Refuses To Abort Baby With Cleft Lip

14 0
13.07.2026

1 Trending: Watch: Trans Lover Says Alleged Charlie Kirk Assassin Admitted He ‘Wishes He Hadn’t Done It’

2 Trending: Lawsuit: Minnesota Students Can Be Expelled For Saying Men And Women Are Different

3 Trending: After Defending Murder Fantasies And 9/11 Apologists, Dems Only Dumped Platner Because He Was Going To Lose

4 Trending: Grassley: Trump’s DOJ Is The Most Transparent, Shining A Light On Dark Biden-Era Secrets

Same-Sex Couple Sues Surrogate After She Refuses To Abort Baby With Cleft Lip

‘I just feel used … They didn’t get the perfect child they wanted and they threw me away,’ the single mother said.

Share Article on Facebook

Share Article on Twitter

Share Article on Truth Social

Share Article via Email

A same-sex couple in Canada is suing the single mother they chose to carry their baby after she refused to abort their baby over a prenatal cleft lip diagnosis.

The civil suit filed in May reportedly seeks $600,000 in damages and comes just two years after the woman refused the couple’s demands to abort their commissioned child at 22 weeks gestation over a “cleft lip and possible genetic abnormalities.”

Cleft lip treatment, especially when the repair is initiated shortly after birth, boasts a high success rate and rarely proves fatal. When the intended parents learned their child would likely be born with the lip split due to unjoined tissues, however, they tried to compel the surrogate mother to end the baby’s life.

“Considering that medical tests indicate that the fetus has, or is likely to have, a genetic, chromosomal or other abnormality or defect, and in accordance with article 8.5 (a) of our surrogacy agreement … we want to inform you of our wish that the pregnancy be terminated,” the July 2024 abortion demand obtained by National Post read. “Although very difficult, this decision is free and informed.”

The “devastated” surrogate protested the decision. She noted that while she would permit abortion if the baby boy “had no chance of survival after birth,” she disagreed........

© The Federalist