1 Trending: In Public Attacks On SCOTUS, Sotomayor Sinks To A New Low

2 Trending: The Kennedy Center Is A Shrine To The D.C. Decadence. Tear It Down

3 Trending: DOJ: Federal Ban On Sale Of Handguns To 18-Year-Olds Is Unconstitutional

4 Trending: What Is An American? The Civic Nationalists Have No Idea

Nikole Hannah-Jones Sacrificed Her Kid For Race Communism. Imagine Her Plan For Yours

Hannah-Jones sacrificed her daughter at the altar of race communism for no reason. Imagine what Hannah-Jones and others like her would do to your children if given the chance?

Share Article on Facebook

Share Article on Twitter

Share Article on Truth Social

Share Article via Email

“I just want what’s best for you.” My parents said that to me countless times when I questioned a decision they made on my behalf. Most parents say some version of that. Even though as children we may not understand why our parents did something, we could trust that our parents were in fact doing what was best for us and were trying to put us first.

But Nikole Hannah-Jones’ daughter cannot say the same. For, as Hannah-Jones herself writes in a New York Times op-ed, she “had not chosen [her daughter]” nor had she given her “what she needed to thrive.”

Instead, Hannah-Jones sacrificed her daughter for race communism.

In the op-ed, the creator of the 1619 Project explained that she and her husband failed their daughter, Najya, by placing her in a failing public school despite having the means to provide their daughter with a good education. Hannah-Jones explained how her money, connections, and advocacy could improve the school for every child, with her daughter being used as the conduit to make that a reality.

“Najya deserved better,” Hannah-Jones wrote. “They all did. But she was mine. This girl, my only child, looked to me to protect her, to give her what she needed to thrive. And I had not chosen her.”

Najya confronted Hannah-Jones with this herself, telling her mother: “Sometimes I wish instead of always thinking about other kids, you would have thought about me. I never really got the education I wanted.”

“This is when I would have normally responded with something like ‘I did think of you, and I knew you’d be OK’ or ‘You are doing just fine at your selective high school.’ But not this time. I just said, simply, ‘I acknowledge to you that I didn’t do the best for you, and I am so sorry,’” Hannah-Jones wrote.

But as Oilfield Rando pointed out on X in response to this astonishing admission, “If they will intentionally harm their own children to advance their cause, imagine what they’ll do to YOUR children.”

It’s that reality that makes Hannah-Jones’ article much bigger than just a personal admission of guilt. Hannah-Jones knew which schools affluent people — like herself — avoided sending their kids to. In fact, she wrote an article in 2016 about her decision to send her daughter to one of these schools. Hannah-Jones previously explained that she was having to navigate “our nation’s racial legacy in this country” and that when deciding where to send her daughter to school, she found the “schools are a disturbing reflection of New York City’s........

© The Federalist