menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

Judicial Tyranny is a Threat to the Rule of Law

5 5
23.02.2026

Judicial Tyranny is a Threat to the Rule of Law

As Lawsuits Multiply, Transgender Reversal Movement Gains Momentum

Trans Lawmaker Wants You to Believe Porn Sites Are ‘Educational’ for ‘Queer Kids’

‘Tonight Was All for the Country’: USA Defeats Rival Canada for Olympic Hockey Gold

Trump Administration Keeps Vast Number of Guns From Mexican Cartels

Why Are Anti-ICE Activists Building Borders?

EXCLUSIVE: Heritage Says States Should Charge Tuition to Illegal Alien Children

Wisconsin Residents Reject ‘Minnesota Nice’ on Immigration

 InternationalCommentary

Cracking Down on China’s Trade Cheating the Right Way

Time for Denmark and the United States to Secure Greenland

Daughter Pleads for Father’s Release From Chinese Prison 

What to Expect in PLA Activities Near Taiwan Leading Up to Trump and Xi Summit

Conservatives Look to Protect Truckers From ‘Unqualified’ Illegal Immigrant Drivers

House to Vote on Trump’s War Powers

Democrats Make Pick to Respond to Trump’s SOTU Address

Republicans Fear Midterm Loss After Gonzales Denies Affair

More States Moving to Close Election Funding Loophole Few Voters Knew Existed

ACLU Looks to Dismantle Ohio Election Integrity Law

Largest ‘Precinct’: Why Some Mail Ballots Travel Across State Lines Before Counting Begins

Schumer Vows to Fight Supposed ‘Jim Crow 2.0’ Bill With Policy 83% of Americans Support

‘War Was Visited Upon These People’: Play About Oct. 7 Comes to DC

Are Americans Being Radicalized Online and Converting to Islam?

International Analysis

Why Is the Iran Regime on the Verge of Collapse?

Trump Envoy Announces Next Phase of Gaza Peace Plan 

Meet the People Fueling Chaos in Minneapolis, New York, and Beyond 

OH BABY! Couples Could Make Big Money on Trump Accounts

What Comes Next for Venezuela? State Department Official Explains

ICE Operations: What Americans Actually Want  

Glib Barista AOC’s Ignorance Front and Center at Munich Security Conference

The New Democratic Socialist Party Is a ‘Graveyard of Bad Ideas’

International Commentary

Victor Davis Hanson: Rubio Tells Europe What It Needs to Hear

EXPOSED: Taxpayers Paying for Democrat Activists’ Grad School Tuition

Judicial Tyranny is a Threat to the Rule of Law

Heather Diehl/Getty Images

Victor Joecks / @VictorJoecks

Victor Joecks is a columnist for the Las Vegas Review-Journal.

Just because someone is wearing a black robe doesn’t mean they’re upholding the rule of law. Consider some recent judicial rulings.

Last November, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem published a notice ending Temporary Protected Status for Haitians. Leave aside the merits of that decision. The law is clear that this decision belongs to the Trump administration.

Congress created TPS in 1990. It applies to citizens of other countries living in the United States. It offers recipients temporary legal protection after their home country has been affected by a natural disaster or other hardship. Basically, the government says things in your home country are so terrible that it won’t force you to leave or deport you.

The Secretary of Homeland Security decides which countries fit this description. The designation can last for 6, 12 or 18 months. Before a designation expires, the Secretary can choose to extend it or end it. In the case of Haiti, the impetus for this “temporary” status was a 2010 earthquake.

“There is no judicial review of any determination of the Attorney General with respect to the designation, or termination or extension of a designation, of a foreign state under this subsection,” the law states. After 9/11, Congress moved authority over enforcing immigration law from the Attorney General to the DHS Secretary.

The takeaway is clear. A judge doesn’t get to second-guess Noem’s decision. Doing so wouldn’t just violate the law. It’d run afoul of recent Supreme Court precedent. In a 6-to-3 ruling last October, the Supreme Court smacked down a California judge who told DHS it couldn’t end TPS for Venezuelan nationals.

That didn’t stop District Court Judge Ana Reyes. Earlier this month, she ordered the Trump administration to keep TPS in place for Haitians. Her ruling reads like a screed one would find on Bluesky, the social media app for liberals seeking sanctuary from conservatives.

She admits that the court doesn’t have jurisdiction over Noem’s decision. But plaintiffs challenged “how the Secretary went about making her determination.”

Yes, that’s as absurd as it sounds. It requires deeming that “any determination” doesn’t actually mean “any determination.” Unfortunately, Reyes isn’t the only judge who’s more interested in outcomes than applying the law.

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled recently that the Trump administration can detain people it wants to deport. But two Texas judges, who should have been bound by that precedent, quickly found a workaround. District Judge David Briones said longtime illegal immigrants had a “liberty interest” in not being detained.

Criminals everywhere nodded in agreement. Law-abiding citizens, not so much.

Ironically, the disgraced Jeffrey Toobin identified the underlying problem in a recent New York Times column. He wrote about the American Constitution Society and its new president, Phil Brest. The group is trying to become a left-wing Federalist Society.

Its goal is “to expand the use of the courts to oppose President Trump’s agenda,” Toobin wrote.

But while leftist judges are clear on their enemy, they aren’t sure about their alternative.

“As for what those judges will stand for–as opposed to what they stand against–Mr. Brest has no clear answer,” Toobin wrote.

Understand what’s happening here. Since Democrats in Congress can’t stop President Donald Trump, leftist judges are actively working to thwart his agenda. They aren’t neutrally applying a coherent judicial philosophy. They don’t have one.

This violates the separation of powers. It’s poison to the rule of law. It’s the result of the left’s embrace of critical theory worldview, which holds that truth is relative. Adherents believe that power, not principle, is all that matters.

Liberal judges can’t undo the 2024 election results, but they want to strip Trump of his constitutional authority.

This is judicial tyranny–a grave threat to the country’s constitutional order.

COPYRIGHT 2026 CREATORS.COM

We publish a variety of perspectives. Nothing written here is to be construed as representing the views of The Daily Signal.

Census Battle: How This Lawsuit Could Change Political Power in Congress

FACT CHECK: Does the FACE Act Protect Churches?

How a Nonprofit That Helps 15-Year-Old Girls Obtain Abortion Pills Found Itself in the Crosshairs of South Dakota

Read the first chapter of The Woketopus right now for FREE

Today, even with President Trump’s victory, leftist elites have their tentacles in every aspect of our government.

The Daily Signal’s own Tyler O’Neil exposes this leftist cabal in his new book, The Woketopus: The Dark Money Cabal Manipulating the Federal Government.

In this book, O’Neil reveals how the Left’s NGO apparatus pursues its woke agenda, maneuvering like an octopus by circumventing Congress and entrenching its interests in the federal government.

You can read the first chapter of this new book for FREE in this eBook, The Woketopus: Chapter One using the secure link below.

The Tony Kinnett Cast

The Daily Signal Podcast

© 2025 The Daily Signal Media Group, Inc. All rights reserved.

We use cookies on our website. By using our website, you consent to cookies.  Learn More .  


© The Daily Signal