US News Metro Long Island Politics

Sports NFL MLB Olympics NBA NHL College Football College Basketball WNBA

Entertainment TV Movies Music Celebrities Awards Theater

Lifestyle Weird But True Sex & Relationships Viral Trends Human Interest Parenting Fashion & Beauty Food & Drink Travel

Health Wellness Fitness Health Care Medicine Men’s Health Women’s Health Mental Health Nutrition

Science Space Environment Wildlife Archaeology

Today’s Paper Covers Columnists Horoscopes Crosswords & Games Sports Odds Podcasts Careers

Email Newsletters Official Store Home Delivery Tips

Switch between CA and NY editions here.

Supreme Court must go to bat for baseball great Roberto Clemente — and defend our property rights

See more of our coverage in your search results.

Roberto Clemente collected exactly 3,000 hits in his Hall of Fame career.

Puerto Rico’s government collected something else from his name: roughly $15 million.

In 2021, the commonwealth enacted laws requiring motorists to pay extra for license plates and registration tags bearing the baseball legend’s name, image, jersey number 21 and references to his hit total.

The money went into a government fund.

But Clemente’s sons, who have spent decades preserving and licensing their father’s trademark and humanitarian legacy, objected to the program — and received none of its proceeds.

So with the help of the Beacon Center of Tennessee they sued under the Lanham Act, which governs trademarks, and the Fifth Amendment’s Takings Clause.

Legendary ballplayer is greatest in history — at making money — as $162M in memorabilia sold

How to watch the new Roberto Clemente documentary ‘Clemente’ for free

Pirates restoring Roberto Clemente tribute after backlash from legend’s family, fans over alcohol ad

The US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit allowed parts of their trademark case to continue but tossed the constitutional claim, reasoning that the Supreme Court’s categorical rule requiring compensation when government takes property applies only to tangible goods.

A trademark, being “intangible,” gets sent to the legal minor leagues: the open-ended Penn Central balancing test, under which property owners rarely score.

The Supreme Court should call that distinction out — because........

© New York Post