Aross the length and breadth of the country, and particularly in J&K, there is an undeniable surge in civil construction. Earth movers dot the landscape, roads are being widened, drains are being dug, and public buildings are rising from the ground. To the untrained eye, this flurry of activity paints a picture of a region on the march, a testament to developmental focus and economic momentum. However, a closer, more discerning inspection reveals a deeply unsettling reality. The civil works, ubiquitous as they are, suffer from a chronic, systemic affliction: they are overwhelmingly of a shockingly low grade. We are building at an unprecedented pace, but we are building poorly. It is a facade of progress, masking an impending infrastructural disaster that will cost the exchequer and the taxpayer dearly in the years to come. 

To understand why newly laid roads wash away with the first monsoon showers, or why freshly plastered walls develop cracks before a project is even officially inaugurated, one must look at the genesis of the problem: the tendering process. The root cause of this infrastructural malaise lies in the prevailing culture of contractors quoting at the absolute minimum rate. Driven by a flawed procurement ecosystem that blindly worships the L1 (lowest bidder) metric, contractors engage in a race to the bottom. In their desperation to secure tenders and outbid competitors, they quote prices that are fundamentally detached from the economic realities of sound construction. 

Let us be brutally clear about the arithmetic of construction: quality comes at a price. When a contractor wins a bid at a rate that barely covers the base cost of standard operations, the profit margin—and indeed, the survival margin—must be extracted from elsewhere. It is an open secret in the construction industry that an impossibly low bid is not a sign of incredible efficiency; it is a preamble to compromised quality. The government, by accepting these rock-bottom quotes without rigorously questioning their feasibility, becomes a willing accomplice in the degradation of its own infrastructure. We celebrate the financial savings on paper, completely ignoring the massive recurring costs of maintenance, repair, and premature replacement that will inevitably follow. 

When contractors are squeezed by the very minimum rates they themselves quoted, the immediate casualty is the material used. It is entirely........

© Greater Kashmir