August protests in Arghanj Khwaj—after July and Nasi—saw local gold panners push contracted firms and machines off traditional sites; they say Taliban “regulation” (Hibatullah’s panning decree, ministry leases) closes small workshops while connected operators stay.

Officials cite ~100,000 people tied to Badakhshan gold, hundreds of licenses, 203 contracts over four years, a 1,000-fighter mining force, and Kandahar efforts to centralize revenue—treated as patronage and territorial control, not only geology. Shiwa reporting: polluted water, dust, lost farms and grazing.

The author recalls Global Witness-style strongman capture and links livelihood exclusion to northern unrest; recommendations are published contracts and owners, local access and appeals, restoration bonds, a district revenue share, and independent scrutiny.

The protest by gold workers in Arghanj Khwah is more than a labour dispute. It is a warning about the political economy taking shape under Taliban rule. Local miners say companies operating with Taliban contracts have restricted access to areas where families traditionally earned a living through manual extraction. During the August protest, residents reportedly forced some companies and machinery out. Similar complaints surfaced in July demonstrations, when workers said small workshops were closed while sites linked to powerful figures remained active. Earlier protests in Nasi carried the same message. People who depend on local goldfields increasingly believe the rules are being rewritten against them. 

The Taliban presents this as regulation. Hibatullah Akhundzada’s gold panning decree classified suitable state land for gold panning as protected and directed the........

© Eurasia Review