Dr. Nadia Helmy is an Egyptian expert on Chinese politics, the policies of the ruling Communist Party of China, and Asian affairs. She currently serves as Professor of Political Science at Beni Suef University, Egypt. In addition, she is a Visiting Senior Researcher at the Centre for Middle Eastern Studies (CMES), Lund University, Sweden, where she also directs the South and East Asia Studies Unit.

For much of the late 20th century, Western security services regarded Chinese intelligence as primarily focused on domestic stability. In recent years, however, allegations of espionage, cyber operations, and covert activities have reshaped this perception. Today, China’s intelligence apparatus is seen as an increasingly active global player, though far less publicly discussed than agencies like the CIA or Mossad. How should we understand Chinese intelligence—its tactics, methods, and strategic objectives?

The world’s perception of Chinese intelligence has shifted from a closed, inward-looking apparatus to a transnational superpower. To understand this entity, it must be viewed as a system that does not separate national security, economic growth, and political stability. A simplified analysis of their methods and objectives can be achieved by understanding their strategic goals, namely the “great rejuvenation” of the Chinese nation. Chinese intelligence operates to achieve three major objectives: (Ensuring the Survival of the Regime): monitoring dissidents abroad, such as the (Falun Gong movement or Uyghur and Tibetan activists), (Technological Superiority): acquiring Western technological secrets (artificial intelligence, semiconductors, and renewable energy) to bridge the technological gap, and (Political Influence): influencing decision-making centres in Western countries to ensure pro-China policies.

To this end, Chinese intelligence agencies employ a strategy of tactics and methods known in intelligence circles as “a thousand grains of sand”. China employs a unique strategy that differs from the traditional James Bond approach,through:

A whole-of-society approach: Instead of relying solely on professional officers, China leverages “non-traditional sources” such as academics, students, and businesspeople, sometimes referred to as the “thousand grains of sand” theory (collecting small pieces of information from a large number of sources to form a complete picture).

Professional cyber espionage: China possesses one of the world’s largest cyber attack armies, primarily focused on corporate espionage and intellectual property theft, not just military secrets.

Human intelligence (HUMINT): This involves cultivating long-term relationships with former officials or academics through professional networking platforms like LinkedIn to offer seemingly legitimate research or consulting services.

Finally, the (institutional structure) plays a vital role in the success of Chinese intelligence agencies. The main driving force is the (Ministry of State Security) “MSS”, which combines functions similar to those of the CIA and FBI.  But what is unique is the role of the United Front Work Department, a Communist Party agency that aims to neutralize adversaries and garner support among Chinese communities abroad and foreign elites.

 What makes the work of Chinese intelligence agencies “different” is that while Mossad, for example, focuses on kinetic operations and assassinations, and US intelligence........

© Eurasia Review