The Failures in the Harris ’24 Autopsy

The Democratic National Committee’s long awaited and long suppressed analysis of Kamala Harris’s campaign bodes ill for the party’s future.

Meda Parameswara Reddy | June 4, 2026

On May 21, 2026, the Democratic National Committee released its long-awaited — and long-suppressed — 192-page autopsy of Kamala Harris's 2024 presidential defeat.  The document was written by Democrat strategist Paul Rivera at the request of DNC chair Ken Martin.  When Martin finally released it, he attached an extraordinary disclaimer: “I am not proud of this product; it does not meet my standards, and it won’t meet your standards. I don’t endorse what’s in this report, or what’s left out of it.”  That passage tells you nearly everything you need to know about the document’s credibility.

The report itself is riddled with factual errors, missing its executive summary and conclusion entirely, and annotated throughout with DNC disclaimers such as “claim contradicts public reporting” and “analysis not supported by publicly available data.”  It was released only because CNN had already obtained it and was preparing to publish it.  The DNC, true to form, managed to achieve the worst of all worlds: It suppressed the report long enough to invite suspicion, then released a document so incomplete that it invited ridicule.

What the autopsy says is secondary to what it omits. And what it omits is the real story of why Harris lost.

The Strategic Failure

The report concludes that Harris failed to separate herself from Biden, didn’t make an “affirmative case” for herself, and was hurt by a Trump ad about transgender inmates.  These are real but peripheral.  They describe symptoms, not causes.

The cause was simpler and more damning: Harris ran a campaign that devoted the overwhelming majority of its........

© American Thinker