Our political battles increasingly share a common theme: each side fears what the other will do when it controls the machinery of government. Battles over the Supreme Court, presidential authority, federal agencies, and congressional power all raise the same question.

But, perhaps we are asking the wrong question.

Both parties are fighting for a weapon that will eventually be used against them

They rigged the maps to force you to pay for their ‘-isms’

Harry and Meghan are back to cash in on Britain’s $680 million royal lie

Instead of asking who should wield political power, what if we asked how much power anyone should possess?

That was the question the Founders confronted.

The Constitution is increasingly treated as an obstacle rather than an achievement. They say the Electoral College is obsolete. The Senate is undemocratic. Federalism is inconvenient. Separation of powers is inefficient. Modern America, we are told, needs stronger national institutions, quicker decisions, and fewer constitutional restraints.

But what if the Constitution was never primarily about the world of........

© Washington Examiner