Blaming Israel Won’t Save the American Right
A growing strand on the American Right now argues that Israel is a foreign policy liability—an expensive entanglement draining U.S. resources. The prescription is simple: cut aid, disengage, and domestic renewal will follow.
Nevertheless, that argument collapses when examined based on scale, comparison, and structure.
Let’s start with facts. The United States provides Israel roughly $3.8 billion annually—about 0.06% of its $6.1 trillion budget. Meanwhile, deficits run between $1.5 and $2 trillion per year, national debt exceeds $37 trillion, and entitlements alone consume over $3 trillion annually. In that context, Israel is not driving U.S. fiscal stress; it barely registers. Hence, eliminating that assistance would not alter the trajectory—it would simply remove a convenient talking point.
Further, comparison exposes the selectivity. The U.S. provides $10–12 billion annually to Ukraine, roughly $1.5–2 billion to Egypt, and $1.3–1.4 billion to Jordan, in addition to the long tail of Iraq and Afghanistan and the cost of maintaining more than 700 overseas bases. Thus, Israel is not exceptional—yet it is treated as if it were. What appears as a fiscal concern is, in practice, a narrative choice.
The composition of aid reinforces this point. Roughly 70–75% of U.S. assistance to Israel is spent inside the United States, tied to procurement from American defense firms. In other words, this is not external redistribution but a form of domestic industrial policy routed through an ally.
From there, the argument shifts from cost to return—and here, too, it weakens. U.S.–Israel trade reaches roughly $50 billion annually, while Israeli firms have invested over $24 billion into the U.S. economy, particularly in cybersecurity, artificial intelligence, and semiconductors. At the same time, Israel spends about 5% of its GDP on research and development—the highest in the OECD—positioning it as a key node in high-end innovation ecosystems that directly benefit the United States.
The deeper failure of the argument, however, is strategic. Roughly 20% of global oil flows through the Strait of Hormuz, while the Red Sea and Suez Canal carry between 12% and 15% of global trade. Within this geostrategic framework, Israel functions as a forward-positioned security and technology platform.........
