Two recent tragedies, though fundamentally different, force us to confront an uncomfortable question about the culture of our schools. In one incident, a very young child reportedly collapsed and died after allegedly being physically punished by a teacher over incomplete homework. The precise circumstances and medical cause require due investigation, but the allegation itself is deeply disturbing.

In another incident, a school principal was reportedly killed in an alleged act of extreme violence involving students. The circumstances of that case too require careful investigation. These incidents should not be treated as mirror images. One concerns an alleged misuse of adult authority against a child; the other concerns alleged violence against an educator. Their legal and moral dimensions are different. Yet together they compel us to examine something larger: the culture of boundaries, responsibility, authority and human relationships within our educational institutions.

A school is meant to be a place where children learn not only academic subjects, but also how human beings should treat one another. That places an enormous responsibility on every adult and every student within the school community. There was a time when physical punishment was casually accepted as part of schooling. Many adults grew up hearing that a teacher punished a child because the teacher cared. The flaw in that logic is exposed. A five- or six-year-old does not become a better learner because fear has entered the classroom.

Fear may produce immediate compliance, but compliance is not learning, and obedience is not character. Teachers absolutely have a responsibility to correct children. Children need boundaries, routines and consequences. But correction must preserve dignity. There is a fundamental difference between telling a child, “This behaviour is unacceptable; let us work together to change it,” and making the child feel worthless or deserving of pain.

Physical punishment, intimidation and public humiliation are not signs of strong pedagogy. They indicate that an adult has failed to find a more constructive way of exercising authority. This is particularly important in the early years. A child who enters school with curiosity should not gradually learn to associate the classroom with fear. The question every school leader should therefore ask is simple but difficult: have academic expectations ever been allowed to become more important than the emotional and physical safety of children? If the answer is yes, those practices and systems must change.

Rejecting authoritarianism, however, does not mean rejecting........

© The Statesman