There is no officially published change in the numerical position of Pakistan’s Asim Munir in the Warrant of Precedence by virtue of his elevation to the rank of Field Marshal. Since the position of Field Marshal is honorary, the Government of Pakistan has stated that Munir would continue to serve as the Chief of the Army Staff, indicating that the promotion itself did not create a new constitutional or protocol office. While it remains the highest military rank in the Pakistan Army, it does not, by itself, confer any constitutional, extraconstitutional, or civilian role in the governance of the state.

It affords military stature and distinction alone. Any authority exercised by a Field Marshal derives from the office held under the Constitution or applicable law – not from the rank itself. Accordingly, the rank cannot legitimise an expansion into civilian domains or alter the constitutional distribution of executive authority. However, in practical terms, the Pakistan military has historically exercised significant de facto influence over the country’s political system, often extending beyond its formal, functional, and constitutional mandate.

This distinction between formal legal authority and practical political influence remains central to understanding civil-military relations in Pakistan. The infamous remark attributed to General Zia-ul-Haq when questioned about constitutional limits remains telling: “The Constitution is only a booklet. I can tear it up and say that tomorrow we shall live under a different system. Is there anybody to stop me?” That same sentiment was echoed decades later by General Pervez Musharraf, who rationalised his 1999 seizure of power with the cold assertion: “What is the Constitution? It is but a piece of paper to be thrown into the dustbin.”

Today, Pakistan appears to be witnessing a similar expansion of military influence under Field Marshal Munir, who is publicly seen undertaking a range of activities extending beyond the traditional responsibilities of a military commander. These include engagements with foreign heads of government, visits to foreign capitals, meetings with diplomatic and economic stakeholders, participation in discussions on national economic priorities, and involvement in matters of domestic political and governance significance.

His engagements with international leaders and........

© The Statesman