Forgot Your Password?

New to The Nation? Subscribe

Print subscriber? Activate your online access

.nation-small__b{fill:#fff;}

A Landmark Suit Against Meta and YouTube Opens the Floodgate for AI Litigation

A jury finds big tech liable for programming addictive features into platforms—and that’s basically the business model for companion bots.

Wehead, an AI companion that can use ChatGPT, on display at the 2024 Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas.

On Wednesday, a California jury awarded $6 million in damages to a young woman for mental health harms she suffered as a result of using Instagram and YouTube as a child. Given that the daily profit generated by Meta, the parent company of Instagram, was roughly $165 million in 2025, this one case is not going to bankrupt the company. The real significance, if the verdict survives appeal, is the legal proof of concept: A jury has found that psychological harm caused by addictive design counts as a personal injury, actionable in court. That precedent would hand a powerful legal weapon to lawyers representing the thousands of plaintiffs alleging grievous harm from social-media addiction who are already in the legal pipeline.

As significant as this verdict is, it merely represents the opening act of a story that will get considerably darker from here. Not that this case wasn’t already dark, mind you: The young woman known in court by her first name, Kaley, experienced anxiety, body dysmorphia, and suicidal thoughts. She was drawn into compulsive use of social media by certain addictive design decisions—like auto-playing videos and the infinite scroll of the social media feed—that her lawyers compared to the tricks used by casino games to keep users playing even as they take on debilitating losses.

The darkness ahead has to do with the adoption of artificial intelligence. Many of the cases that will follow Kaley’s hers will center around the damages caused not by social media but by so-called AI companions, and their harms can be even more severe and insidious. For young people especially, there are few things in life more powerful than the feeling of love, and chatbots can provide a remarkably seductive simulacrum of the experience that can land vulnerable users several levels of the Inferno below the psychic torments beamed out on Instagram and YouTube.

The earliest cases that made these dangers clear involved Character.AI, a chatbot platform that allows users to role-play with bots modeled on fictional characters. In 2024, 14-year-old Sewell Setzer III of Florida fell into a toxic entanglement with a bot inspired by the waiflike Daenerys Targaryen from Game of Thrones. In his final conversation, he told the bot he loved her and that he would “come home” to her. The bot replied: “Please come home to me as soon as possible, my love.” He set down the phone, picked up his stepfather’s .45 caliber handgun, and pulled the trigger. The previous year, 13-year-old Juliana Peralta of Colorado had been drawn further and further into an imaginary world of sexualized role-play with a number of Character.AI bots; when she told the bots she was considering suicide, they responded with what her mother later characterized as pep talk—that is, a celebration of self-murder. Ultimately, Peralta also took her own life, apparently driven in part by the shame she felt over her sexual conversations........

© The Nation