Candace Owens destroyed by Andrew Wilson in Charlie Kirk debate

descriptions off, selected

captions settings, opens captions settings dialog

Subtitles (en), selected

This is a modal window.

Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.

End of dialog window.

Candace Owens destroyed By Andrew Wilson in Charlie Kirk debate: Robby Soave | RISING

Candace Owens destroyed By Andrew Wilson in Charlie Kirk debate: Robby Soave | RISING

I watched the Candace Owens and Andrew Wilson debate about who killed Charlie Kirk so that you don’t have to.  

On one side, you had Andrew Wilson, a conservative commentator and expert on firearms, who believes the totality of the evidence is very persuasive that Tyler Robinson, the suspect who is being prosecuted for killing Kirk, actually was Kirk’s killer. And, spoilers: He is completely right.  

On the other side, you have Candace Owens, who thinks it just doesn’t add up and there were other people involved: Robinson is, in her view, a patsy. He’s been set up by the U.S. government or Israel or Turning Point USA, or some other third-party group. Sigh.  

In my humble opinion, the verdict wasn’t close: Wilson destroyed and humiliated Owens, who proved she has no idea what she’s talking about. She had no evidence whatsoever to support her theories, no logical basis to make her claims, and no ability to explain her absurd conclusion that there’s zero chance Robinson killed Kirk. Zero chance, that’s her position.  

It’s insane. Take a look.  

The debate was four hours long, hosted by Patrick Bet-David. Wilson allegedly put up $300,000 of his own money to secure Owens’s participation, because he thought he was doing a public service by challenging her unsupported claims. There’s an argument to be made that his strategy backfired, however........

© The Hill