1 Trending: ‘Grotesque Results’ Of Birth Tourism Allow Foreign Invaders To Seize Control Of U.S. From The Inside

2 Trending: SCOTUS Will Decide Constitutionality Of So-Called ‘Assault Weapons’ Bans

3 Trending: Leftist Wisconsin AG Wants To Hide Court Docs In Alternate Electors Case

4 Trending: SCOTUS Declines To Stop Blockade On Trump’s Library Of Congress Firing

SCOTUS Win For Trump Admin Should Motivate Us To Eliminate TPS Completely

The only way to ensure we don’t witness abuses of TPS once again is to shut down the questionable program completely.

Share Article on Facebook

Share Article on Twitter

Share Article on Truth Social

Share Article via Email

The Trump administration just received another win from the Supreme Court on Thursday in the case of Mullin v. Doe, in which a 6-3 conservative majority on the court upheld the president’s decision to rescind Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Haitians and Syrians who had been previously permitted to reside in the U.S. Correcting former the abuse of TPS under the Biden administration and removing the Haitians from American communities such as Springfield, Ohio, was a key campaign pledge from Donald Trump and JD Vance in 2024, memorably marked by Trump’s colorful comments about the predatory dietary habits of the invaders.   

The entire case hung upon the question of whether executive determinations and designations about the status of foreign countries (whether or not those countries should be eligible for Temporary Protected Status in the U.S.) are judicially reviewable. Arguably, this case should never have reached the Supreme Court, given the TPS statute explicitly states that the determinations of the executive (made through the Secretary of Homeland Security) are non-reviewable by the judiciary. Justice Samuel Alito’s opinion upheld this common-sense interpretation, concluding that the plaintiffs could not proceed with their case. As determined by President Trump’s secretary of Homeland Security, the Haitians and Syrians (as well as foreign nationals from nearly a dozen other countries) will no longer receive TPS and are thus eligible for removal from the U.S. to their home countries or to third countries.   

In his opinion, Alito deftly noted that despite the promise that TPS would grant a “temporary” status, it has more often than not effectively been........

© The Federalist