menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

Soros-Backed Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner Referred For Criminal Investigation

5 0
16.09.2026

1 Trending: Alito Hints Liberal Justices Slow-Walked Dissents To Stop Trump’s Elections Order For Midterms

2 Trending: Assimilation Means More Than Going To A Football Game

3 Trending: In Corrupt Milwaukee, Election Integrity Dies In Darkness

4 Trending: SCOTUS Blocks Trump’s Mail-In Voting Order Ahead Of Midterms

Soros-Backed Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner Referred For Criminal Investigation

Testimony showed that Krasner repeatedly complained about having his case taken over by ‘Nazis.’

Share Article on Facebook

Share Article on Twitter

Share Article on Truth Social

Share Article via Email

Pointing to evidence of “false statements, false declarations made under oath, perjury, obstruction of justice, and conspiracy,” a federal judge has issued a memorandum asking the Department of Justice to open a criminal investigation into Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner and a top deputy in his office, Matthew Stiegler.

It’s familiar stuff. Krasner, a spectacularly woke prosecutor who won the office with lavish backing from George Soros, has a long history of scandal and crisis, and has been accused of misleading courts in several high-profile cases. This is an old headline from June, covering the same ground in a different matter:

The current controversy involves an effort by a convicted murderer, Dennis Johnson, to be freed from prison, turning to the federal courts with a repeated request for a writ of habeas corpus after state courts denied his several petitions for release. Turning to the agency that prosecuted Johnson’s 2009 murder case, many years before Krasner became the DA, the court asked the Philadelphia DA’s office if it opposed Johnson’s petitions. Without investigation, Krasner’s office conceded Johnson’s questionable claims about the supposedly flawed murder conviction, telling the court that prosecutors “did not oppose the granting of relief,” according to the memorandum.

Several years later, with the matter still pending before the........

© The Federalist