menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

A biologist queries whether AI ‘borrowed’ his work to make major discovery – an expert explains the rules

19 0
08.10.2026

AI company Anthropic recently announced that its popular system Claude had identified an unusual family of biological molecules. These molecules were enzymes, a type of protein that speeds up chemical reactions in living organisms.

The new group of enzymes were discovered in bacteriophages – viruses that infect bacteria. Anthropic named them array-associated reverse transcriptases (ARTs).

The finding was presented as an example of AI initiating biological discovery. However, a researcher studying the same enzymes then raised a question: had Claude independently recognised their significance, or could unpublished work shared with the chatbot have influenced its result?

Mario Rodríguez Mestre, a PhD candidate in computational biology at the University of Copenhagen in Denmark, says his team members have been investigating these enzymes, which they call “jumbotrons”, since 2022. According to The Scientist magazine, he shared his dissertation and manuscript drafts with Claude.

Anthropic denies that the model was trained on user transcripts or that its biology team had access to them. Mestre’s concerns and Anthropic’s response raise a question that the available reporting cannot independently resolve. There is no established evidence that his unpublished material was used in the discovery.

Mestre is named among the inventors of a patent for engineered “retrons”, genetic systems that contain a reverse transcriptase enzyme and an associated RNA. The patent also........

© The Conversation