Bismarck, North Dakota, ranks No. 1 in rent affordability among 182 U.S. cities in 2026

Rent affordability depends on income, not just price. WalletHub ranked 182 U.S. cities to find where paychecks stretch furthest

FotografiaBasica / Getty Images

Rent has become one of the heaviest financial burdens of the past decade in the U.S. Rental costs climbed by more than 50% over the last 10 years, according to the Federal Reserve's Consumer Price Index, tracking the rise in home prices. Wages did not keep pace, leaving millions of renters to balance stagnant earnings and rising housing bills.

In the country's most affordable cities, rent consumes as little as 15% of the median household income. In the least affordable, it takes nearly 34%. For a household earning the local median wage, the difference amounts to thousands of dollars a year — money that could build an emergency fund, pay down debt, or accumulate toward a home purchase.

Personal finance website WalletHub measured this relationship across more than 180 U.S. cities, dividing median annual gross rent by median annual household income in each location. The resulting ratio captures something raw price comparisons cannot: whether local wages are strong enough to absorb housing costs, or whether renters face pressure regardless of what their lease says.

The cities that fare best are not always the ones with the cheapest apartments. A city with low rents but lower wages can impose just as heavy a burden as a pricier market with strong salaries. The reverse also holds. Several cities on the list carry above-average rents but still score well because local incomes keep pace. The Midwest and Great Plains dominate the top of the table, but surprises appear elsewhere, too.

Below are eight places where renters face the most favorable conditions.

1. Bismarck leads all cities in rent affordability

halbergman / Getty Images

No city in WalletHub's study outperforms Bismarck, North Dakota, where residents devote just 15.29% of their median household income to rent. At the other end of the table, Miami's ratio reaches 33.77% — more than double Bismarck's figure. The distance between those two numbers defines the full range of what affordability can mean in the U.S. today.

Bismarck's edge comes from a combination that is harder to achieve than it appears. The city's median annual gross rent comes in 16th lowest among all cities examined — well below the national midpoint, but not the cheapest in absolute terms. Its median household income is 80th highest, placing it squarely in the middle of the national distribution. Neither number is extreme on its own. Together, they produce a rent-to-income ratio that no other city can match.

Low-rent cities fall into a trap Bismarck avoids. Cheap apartments lose their advantage when local wages are even lower. Its labor market generates enough income to make moderately priced housing feel genuinely manageable — not merely cheap on a spreadsheet.

For renters weighing where to live, Bismarck's result captures a principle that sticker-price comparisons miss entirely. Affordability is a ratio, not a dollar figure. A $900 apartment in a city where the median household earns $35,000 is harder to carry than a $1,200 apartment where earnings reach $60,000. Bismarck........

© Quartz