COMMENTARY: Absence of criminal charges does not prove innocence
Share this Story : PNI Atlantic News Copy Link Email X Reddit Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr
COMMENTARY: Absence of criminal charges does not prove innocence
Alex (Sandy) MacDonald is right about one important principle in his recent opinion piece: serious allegations require serious evidence. Where we disagree is with any suggestion that the absence of criminal charges settles the broader questions surrounding foreign interference, regulatory accountability and national security on Prince Edward Island.
Subscribe now to access this story and more:
Unlimited access to the website and app
Exclusive access to premium content, newsletters and podcasts
Full access to the e-Edition app, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on
Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists
Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists
Subscribe or sign in to your account to continue your reading experience.
Unlimited access to the website and app
Exclusive access to premium content, newsletters and podcasts
Full access to the e-Edition app, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on
Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists
Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists
Create an account or sign in to continue your reading experience.
Access additional stories every month
Share your thoughts and join the conversation in our commenting community
Get email updates from your favourite authors
Sign In or Create an Account
The RCMP investigates whether evidence supports criminal charges. CSIS assesses threats to Canada’s security. IRAC has separate responsibilities concerning landholding limits, beneficial ownership, related parties and regulatory decision-making. These are different mandates with different evidentiary thresholds. A decision not to prosecute does not establish that every intelligence, ownership, governance or regulatory question has been answered. Indeed, according to our discussions with the premier, the RCMP investigation remains ongoing.
MacDonald asks for evidence. So do we.
Investigative research
But Islanders should understand that a considerable body of evidence has already been uncovered through investigative journalism, government records, public inquiries, corporate and land records, institutional documents and the research underlying Canada Under Siege. What journalists, authors and citizens do not possess are the powers of a federal inquiry: the ability to compel documents and testimony, examine government records, hear protected evidence and test competing claims against information unavailable to the public.
We have some of the receipts. A federal public inquiry has the power to obtain the rest.
COMMENTARY: Response to letter about IRAC and P.E.I. Buddhist organizations
COMMENTARY: Has history passed IRAC by?
Advertisement 1Story continues belowThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.document.addEventListener(`DOMContentLoaded`,function(){let........
