menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

COMMENTARY: Absence of criminal charges does not prove innocence

47 0
22.08.2026

Share this Story : PNI Atlantic News Copy Link Email X Reddit Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr

COMMENTARY: Absence of criminal charges does not prove innocence

Alex (Sandy) MacDonald is right about one important principle in his recent opinion piece: serious allegations require serious evidence. Where we disagree is with any suggestion that the absence of criminal charges settles the broader questions surrounding foreign interference, regulatory accountability and national security on Prince Edward Island.

Subscribe now to access this story and more:

Unlimited access to the website and app

Exclusive access to premium content, newsletters and podcasts

Full access to the e-Edition app, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on

Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists

Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists

Subscribe or sign in to your account to continue your reading experience.

Unlimited access to the website and app

Exclusive access to premium content, newsletters and podcasts

Full access to the e-Edition app, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on

Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists

Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists

Create an account or sign in to continue your reading experience.

Access additional stories every month

Share your thoughts and join the conversation in our commenting community

Get email updates from your favourite authors

Sign In or Create an Account

The RCMP investigates whether evidence supports criminal charges. CSIS assesses threats to Canada’s security. IRAC has separate responsibilities concerning landholding limits, beneficial ownership, related parties and regulatory decision-making. These are different mandates with different evidentiary thresholds. A decision not to prosecute does not establish that every intelligence, ownership, governance or regulatory question has been answered. Indeed, according to our discussions with the premier, the RCMP investigation remains ongoing.

MacDonald asks for evidence. So do we.

Investigative research

But Islanders should understand that a considerable body of evidence has already been uncovered through investigative journalism, government records, public inquiries, corporate and land records, institutional documents and the research underlying Canada Under Siege. What journalists, authors and citizens do not possess are the powers of a federal inquiry: the ability to compel documents and testimony, examine government records, hear protected evidence and test competing claims against information unavailable to the public.

We have some of the receipts. A federal public inquiry has the power to obtain the rest.

COMMENTARY: Response to letter about IRAC and P.E.I. Buddhist organizations

COMMENTARY: Has history passed IRAC by?

Advertisement 1Story continues belowThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.document.addEventListener(`DOMContentLoaded`,function(){let........

© PNI Atlantic news