Ben Woodfinden: Dear Supreme Court, you don't have to do this
Share this Story : National Post Copy Link Email X Reddit Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr
Ben Woodfinden: Dear Supreme Court, you don't have to do this
Leave Section 33 alone
You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.
This week, the Supreme Court spent four days hearing interveners on Quebec’s Bill 21, An Act respecting the Laicity of the State, one of the longest hearings in the court’s history.
Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.
Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.
Unlimited online access to National Post.
National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
Support local journalism.
Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.
Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.
Unlimited online access to National Post.
National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
Support local journalism.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Access articles from across Canada with one account.
Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.
Enjoy additional articles per month.
Get email updates from your favourite authors.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Access articles from across Canada with one account
Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments
Enjoy additional articles per month
Get email updates from your favourite authors
Sign In or Create an Account
If the Supreme Court of Canada uses this case to limit or defang Section 33 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms (the notwithstanding clause), as the federal Liberals and progressive activists groups are asking, it will be doing something extraordinarily dangerous and anti-democratic, judicially rewriting a foundational provision of our constitutional order and reading things into the Charter that simply don’t exist.
Ben Woodfinden: Dear Supreme Court, you don't have to do this Back to video
And it will be detonating a political earthquake whose aftershocks could rip the country apart.
This newsletter from NP Comment tackles the topics you care about. (Subscriber-exclusive edition on Fridays)
There was an error, please provide a valid email address.
By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.
A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.
The next issue of Platformed will soon be in your inbox.
We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again
Interested in more newsletters? Browse here.
Quebec’s Bill 21, enacted in 2019, bans certain public-sector workers from wearing religious symbols on the job. It has survived years of legal challenge because Quebec pre-emptively invoked Section 33, shielding it from judicial overruling. There are a myriad of challengers and interveners now before the........
