They do not want political leaders to create controversies about the army and martyrs.

It shows that the army and martyrs are not just a political issue.

It says that the people will not tolerate disrespect towards the army and martyrs.

Maulana Fazlur Rahman’s recent remarks about the Pakistan Army and its martyrs have sparked widespread anger across the country. Pakistanis consider the suggestion that soldiers sacrifice their lives in exchange for salaries unfair and disrespectful. They argue that salaries are a normal part of employment, but no amount of money can compensate for the loss of life or the grief of a family. Soldiers face extreme weather, fight terrorism, defend the borders, and risk their lives to protect the nation. Their sacrifices are rooted in duty, honour, and commitment to the country. The public’s reaction reflects the deep respect people have for the army and those who have laid down their lives for Pakistan. This anger has been expressed on social media, in public gatherings, universities, markets, homes, and television discussions. Citizens have shared stories of martyrs and voiced their support for the armed forces. The remarks have also raised concerns about national unity, military morale, and the importance of respecting the families who have lost their loved ones. At a time when Pakistan faces economic difficulties, security threats, and political tensions, many believe that unity and mutual respect are essential. The army’s role in border security, counterterrorism, disaster relief, and national development makes its contribution particularly important in these challenging circumstances.

The controversy has also been linked to the political situation in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, where analysts believe Maulana Fazlur Rahman was disappointed by the share of power or influence he expected under Governor rule. Some critics argue that he has directed his political frustration towards the army. They maintain that Governor rule was a constitutional decision made by the democratic government and relevant constitutional authorities, not by the army. The military does not distribute political positions or determine the share of power among political parties. Critics therefore consider blaming it for political disappointment unjustified and potentially damaging to national cohesion. They also argue that soldiers are recruited and trained to defend the country, while their salaries are ordinary compensation for their service, not payment for sacrificing their lives. Although Fazlur Rahman has a long political career and the right to criticise state institutions, many believe that criticism should be based on facts and aimed at constructive improvement rather than personal or political grievances. Some observers have also linked his political positioning to the influence of Imran Khan, while reports suggest that even some of his........

© Minute Mirror