menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

The Fight for International Justice Continues

6 0
27.07.2026

Get audio access with any FP subscription. Subscribe Now ALREADY AN FP SUBSCRIBER? LOGIN

Get audio access with any FP subscription.

ALREADY AN FP SUBSCRIBER? LOGIN

Ongoing reports and analysis

The International Criminal Court and the rule of law it undergirds are in trouble. Former ICC prosecutor Fatou Bensouda has warned of a “deep erosion of international justice” taking place. Many ICC judges and other senior officials have been sanctioned by Russia and the United States. After an unduly prolonged investigation, the court’s chief prosecutor has been removed over sexual misconduct allegations.

The ICC has long been criticized for doing too little too slowly, picking on the weak and giving a pass to the powerful. More generally, efforts to secure accountability for crimes in Gaza and Ukraine have confronted pushback. Many atrocities—including those in Syria during the Assad years, China’s crimes against the Uyghurs, and mass killings and rape in Sudan—have gone largely or entirely unpunished.

The International Criminal Court and the rule of law it undergirds are in trouble. Former ICC prosecutor Fatou Bensouda has warned of a “deep erosion of international justice” taking place. Many ICC judges and other senior officials have been sanctioned by Russia and the United States. After an unduly prolonged investigation, the court’s chief prosecutor has been removed over sexual misconduct allegations.

The ICC has long been criticized for doing too little too slowly, picking on the weak and giving a pass to the powerful. More generally, efforts to secure accountability for crimes in Gaza and Ukraine have confronted pushback. Many atrocities—including those in Syria during the Assad years, China’s crimes against the Uyghurs, and mass killings and rape in Sudan—have gone largely or entirely unpunished.

But this does not mean the struggle for international justice is a lost cause. Washington, long an essential, if deeply flawed, champion, has disqualified itself for now. But many countries remain committed to the rule of law, and many people around the world want the powerful held to account for their crimes. Increasingly, these efforts will by necessity take place outside of the ICC. Yet as the upcoming trial of the former leader of the Philippines, Rodrigo Duterte, shows, even a weakened ICC still has a role to play.

The push for accountability now lies in the hands of the same coalition of middle powers that brought the ICC into being a quarter century ago. Continuing to defend the ICC is essential, but more is needed. Universal jurisdiction—the principle that heinous offenses against all humankind can be judged by any state—must become even more universal. Governments outside Europe must invest in the capacity of national prosecutorial units and judges to pursue complex investigations and conduct protracted trials. And when the older Hague-based court, the International Court of Justice (ICJ), which addresses state rather than individual responsibility, issues provisional measures and final judgments, middle powers must push to implement those rulings. Finally, these governments should support the expansion of regional jurisdictions to deal with atrocious situations—such as in Sudan—that........

© Foreign Policy