A court in Niger just billed Europe €115 billion for uranium, coercion, and a century of organized extraction. While Western leaders escalate tensions with Iran in the name of “international order,” the colonized are asking who ordered the order.

History is charming when it stays in museums, framed, dusted, narrated by the winners.

It becomes far less adorable when it hires a lawyer.

On February 1, 2026, a court in Niamey did something profoundly impolite. It decided that memory is admissible evidence. It looked at France, United Kingdom and Germany—three countries more accustomed to issuing lectures than receiving invoices—and said: congratulations, you’re defendants.

The bill? €115 billion. The kind of number normally reserved for bank bailouts, pandemics, or football stadiums. Not for consequences.

For a century, documentation flowed south: treaties, concessions, “cooperation frameworks,” technical annexes—polite theft printed on expensive paper.

Now the paperwork is traveling north. The court borrowed a concept usually reserved for mafias and militias: common criminal enterprise.

Translation: everybody knew, everybody benefited, everybody pays.

The scandal is not the theory. It’s the direction.

For generations, European courts practiced universal jurisdiction like a moral export product. Pirates? Try them. Warlords? Try them. African dictators? Absolutely.

But when universality boomerangs from Niamey, suddenly procedure becomes sacred. Jurisdiction becomes delicate. International law becomes “complex.”

A Conspiracy Lasting… Since the 19th Century

The timeline the court reconstructs begins in 1884 at the Berlin Conference, that elegant buffet where a continent........

© Eurasia Review