When Nations Stop Trusting the United Nations
The first author is a Professor of English at Riphah International University, Lahore, and a lead guest editor at Springer Nature.
The second author is an Associate Professor of English at Government Graduate College for Women, Samanabad, Lahore.
For a critical reader, language functions almost like the DNA of a nation or an individual. It is the means by which countries reveal their underlying beliefs, priorities, tensions, and power relations. This article provides a blueprint for how certain countries use language to legitimise their actions, challenge competing narratives, and seek consent for their preferred understanding of the international order. Powerful countries use these discursive practices to normalise their actions, while simultaneously expecting other nations to regard their positions and strategic interests.
The United Nations General Assembly convenes its 81st session this year under the theme, “Restoring trust, managing transformation: a United Nations that delivers for all.” Since 2005, the UNGA has consistently sought to provide direction to member states through themes addressing major global challenges. If we analyse the themes of the past 21 years, we realise that the UNGA’s central focus has been to promote multilateral action to advance peace, development, human dignity, and a sustainable future for all. The trillion-dollar question, however, is how far the UN has translated these normative commitments into effective multilateral action.
The speech of Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif largely reaffirmed the strength of multilateralism and diplomacy, with peace through dialogue.
The speech of Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif largely reaffirmed the strength of multilateralism and diplomacy, with peace through dialogue.
Indeed, credit goes to the UN for successfully convening these sessions........
