Big Brother Loves Flock Cameras

Will we accept this in the name of “safety,” or reject it to retain a semblance of freedom? Time will tell;

Jeff Crouere , Bio and Archives--August 31, 2026

Cover Story | Comments | Reader Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us

In the aftermath of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, the privacy of American citizens has been seriously compromised. To “keep Americans safe,” the bureaucratic monolith of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) was created, which includes the Transportation Security Administration (TSA).

Between 2003 and 2006, 192.499 NSLs were issued, leading to only “one terror-related conviction"

The Patriot Act was enacted, which “made it easier for the government to spy on ordinary Americans by expanding the authority to monitor phone and email communications, collect bank and credit reporting records, and track the activity of innocent Americans on the Internet.”

The legislation allows government agents to issue National Security Letters (NSLs) “without a judge's approval, to obtain personal information, including phone records, computer records, credit history, and banking history.”

Between 2003 and 2006, 192.499 NSLs were issued, leading to only “one terror-related conviction,” which would have occurred regardless of legislation. Under the Patriot Act, the government never destroys the private information it collects, and it is widely accessible. For example, 34,000 law enforcement and intelligence agents can retrieve collected phone records by NSLs.

The Patriot Act set the stage for the latest tool in the crime-fighting arsenal: surveillance cameras, which police departments staunchly defend as essential technology. The leading company for these systems is Flock Safety, which manufactures “surveillance camera systems that record and analyze everything that passes them.”

Flock cameras are used as “automated license plate readers to track or........

© Canada Free Press