Ideology of the Supreme Court

If the federal judiciary can determine the scope of federal power, then limited government becomes whatever the courts say it is, which is no limitation at all;

Douglas V. Gibbs , Bio and Archives--July 12, 2026

Cover Story | Comments | Reader Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us

Once again, with a new slate of rulings, the United States Supreme Court has revealed to Americans how far it has strayed from the United States Constitution. I am not necessarily referring to their rulings in particular, but that fact that they are operating in the manner that they are. The judicial branch was designed by the Constitution to be the weakest of the three branches (which flies in the face of the “three co-equal branches” lie you were taught in school).

Judicial Review is unconstitutional

Judicial Review is unconstitutional, interpreting the Constitution and federal law in the manner that the federal courts do is unconstitutional, and striking down laws and executive orders with their rulings are unconstitutional. And I know that this constitutional perspective I am tossing at you regarding Judicial Review and the current state of the Supreme Court must seem confusing to some of you. What it should do is raise for you fundamental questions about the proper role of the judiciary in American governance.

First, Judicial Review is unconstitutional. I don’t care how long the legal system has claimed otherwise. The very idea that Judicial Review is unconstitutional........

© Canada Free Press