The most useful warning about military automation last week did not come from a drone swarm, a command center, or a classified exercise. It came from the freezer aisle of a base commissary.

Beginning Aug. 26, military installations across the United States reported refrigeration failures. At Fort Huachuca, Arizona, the commissary said all its freezers had entered defrost mode overnight, and its frozen inventory was spoiled. Other stores restricted sales while technicians inspected or repaired their equipment. What looked mundane on paper became costly before most customers woke up.

When a Maine judge decides whose God wins

Obama’s own economist just exposed the massive cost of green energy mandates

Don’t blame Trump for the collapse of international justice. Blame Jack Smith

The response so far has been measured. The Pentagon acknowledged a possible refrigeration disruption and said the Defense Commissary Agency moved products to alternate temperature-controlled locations and followed food-safety procedures. By Sept. 1, Army and Air Force investigators had opened inquiries, with the Defense Criminal Investigative Service reportedly taking the lead. Repairs and restocking were underway at affected locations.

The government has not announced a cause. Nothing publicly reported establishes that artificial intelligence caused the outages, that every incident had a common source, or that a single remote command triggered them. It could prove to be malicious access, a software or configuration problem, a hardware failure, or more than one unrelated event. Investigators should follow the evidence rather than the most dramatic theory.

Yet the episode belongs in the debate about military AI because it exposes the physical architecture into which AI is moving. When software can monitor or direct a distributed fleet of machines, a cyberattack, an operator error, a faulty update, and an equipment malfunction may produce the same immediate........

© Washington Examiner