menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

GELOSO: Why taxpayers should fear the Buy Canadian Policy

3 0
02.04.2026

SIMMONS EXCLUSIVE: Blue Jays great Roberto Alomar breaks silence on lifetime baseball ban

Defencemen Hayes Hundley, Vinny Borgesi thrilled to join Maple Leafs prospect pool

Webcam model says 'fake boobs' of Kristi Noem’s husband made him unforgettable

Bodycam footage shows Tiger Woods handcuffed and appearing to fall asleep in police car

Quebec producer selling cane-spiked maple syrup: Radio-Canada investigation

Share this Story : Toronto Sun Copy Link Email X Reddit Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr

GELOSO: Why taxpayers should fear the Buy Canadian Policy

Decisions regarding public procurement have major budgetary consequences

You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.

Each year, tens of billions of dollars — more than 13% of the Canadian economy — are spent by Canadian governments on public procurement. An increase of just a few per cent in these expenditures could amount to several billion more on taxpayers’ shoulders.

Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.

Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account.

Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on.

Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists.

Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists.

Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.

Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.

Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account.

Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on.

Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists.

Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists.

Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

Access articles from across Canada with one account.

Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.

Enjoy additional articles per month.

Get email updates from your favourite authors.

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

Access articles from across Canada with one account

Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments

Enjoy additional articles per month

Get email updates from your favourite authors

Don't have an account? Create Account

In a context of rising American protectionism, governments are reinforcing preferential purchase clauses in public contracts. This approach is ill-advised and should be examined in light of the available economic data.

GELOSO: Why taxpayers should fear the Buy Canadian Policy Back to video

The empirical research shows that competition plays a determining role in controlling costs.

Role of competition in cost control

In transport contracts in the United States, for example, each additional bidder is associated with an average reduction in costs of 8.3%, according to a study from the National Bureau of Economic Research. An analysis of more than 1.3 billion calls for tender in Brazil between 2015 and 2018 arrived at a similar conclusion. Greater participation is correlated with a better balance between costs and social benefits.

Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond.

There was an error, please provide a valid email address.

By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.

A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.

The next issue of Your Midday Sun will soon be in your inbox.

We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again

Interested in more newsletters? Browse here.

Conversely, preferential purchase policies are associated with measurable cost increases. In California, a 5% preference given to local firms for certain public projects led to total estimated cost increases of between 1.4% and 3.6%, according to studies published in the Journal of Public Economics and the American Economic Review.

Applied to Canada, a comparable measure would have represented an increase in spending on infrastructure from $4.8 billion to $12.2 billion, according to available data for 2021. This represents an estimated additional cost of between $124 and $320 per Canadian, for this one year alone.

Proper management of public funds

These are not just abstract numbers — they have a real impact. They represent public funds that cannot be invested elsewhere, whether in health care, in education, or in debt reduction.

It’s also a question of the proper management of public funds.

Some will say that these extra costs are compensated for by the creation of quality jobs. Yet, studies show that this is not so.

One study by the National Bureau of Economic Research estimates that the “Buy American” clauses generated a net cost of more than $111,500 per job.

In other words, even when considering the potential benefits, such as the creation or maintenance of certain jobs and the resultant tax revenues, the cost per subsidized worker is still in the six figures. This represents a steep tax bill that prevents the creation of jobs elsewhere in the economy.

The reduction of the number of bidders that accompanies public procurement protectionism also has indirect effects. A less competitive business environment reduces entrepreneurial incentives to innovate, reduce costs, and improve quality. In the long term, this reduces the international competitiveness of Canadian firms.

JARVIS: Doug Ford’s budget continues borrowing binge

JAY GOLDBERG: Ontario and feds take steps on housing but more are needed

LILLEY: PM Carney should heed Poilievre's call for gas tax cuts

Decisions regarding public procurement have major budgetary consequences. The available data show that reduced competition tends to increase costs and reduce efficiency, while more competition means lower costs and better results.

An open and transparent procurement process serves taxpayers well. Public procurement protectionism produces the opposite effect. With billions of dollars at play, the only advisable course is to maximize the efficiency of every dollar spent by the government.

— Vincent Geloso is senior economist at the Montreal Economic Institute

Share this Story : Toronto Sun Copy Link Email X Reddit Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr

Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion. Please keep comments relevant and respectful. Comments may take up to an hour to appear on the site. You will receive an email if there is a reply to your comment, an update to a thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information.

SIMMONS EXCLUSIVE: Blue Jays great Roberto Alomar breaks silence on lifetime baseball ban Toronto Blue Jays

SIMMONS EXCLUSIVE: Blue Jays great Roberto Alomar breaks silence on lifetime baseball ban

Defencemen Hayes Hundley, Vinny Borgesi thrilled to join Maple Leafs prospect pool Toronto Maple Leafs

Defencemen Hayes Hundley, Vinny Borgesi thrilled to join Maple Leafs prospect pool

Webcam model says 'fake boobs' of Kristi Noem’s husband made him unforgettable World

Webcam model says 'fake boobs' of Kristi Noem’s husband made him unforgettable

Bodycam footage shows Tiger Woods handcuffed and appearing to fall asleep in police car Golf

Bodycam footage shows Tiger Woods handcuffed and appearing to fall asleep in police car

Quebec producer selling cane-spiked maple syrup: Radio-Canada investigation Canada

Quebec producer selling cane-spiked maple syrup: Radio-Canada investigation


© Toronto Sun