menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

India’s growing warship gap with China and Pakistan

12 0
latest

Opinion National Interest PoV 50-Word Edit

ThePrint On Camera Videos In Pictures

Society & Culture Around Town Book Excerpts Vigyapanti The Dating Story

More Judiciary Education YourTurn Work With Us Campus Voice

Opinion National Interest PoV 50-Word Edit

ThePrint On Camera Videos In Pictures

Society & Culture Around Town Book Excerpts Vigyapanti The Dating Story

More Judiciary Education YourTurn Work With Us Campus Voice

India’s growing warship gap with China and Pakistan

The absence of a coherent national security strategy has contributed to a procurement system in which decisions are postponed until the capability gap is already visible at sea.

The US-Iran war has dramatically shaken up trade and energy supplies and forced India to confront its maritime dependency. Approximately 95 per cent of India’s trade by volume and about 70 per cent by value moves by sea.

The Modi government has, expectedly, touted recent warship commissionings and the controversial Great Nicobar project as evidence of decisive maritime action. Yet beneath the bluster, it has allowed a widening gap to emerge between India’s naval requirements and its procurement pipeline.

The reality is that orders for the high-end platforms required for sustained combat operations in the Indian Ocean and around the Malacca Strait have stalled. Beyond three frigates now fitting out, the current order book contains no aircraft carrier, destroyer, frigate or attack submarine likely to enter service before 2035.

Also Read: Three reasons why India is overly dependent on China for lithium

Lack of political will and focus

There are many reasons for this unfortunate situation, including funding constraints and persistent bureaucratic delays. However, the underlying reason is insufficient political focus — a gap that could extract a heavy price if conflict were to erupt.

It is the civilian leadership’s job to define a national security strategy that identifies threats, priorities and trade-offs. The armed forces then develop force structures and capabilities to implement these goals. Force planning in the absence of strategy is, by definition, ad hoc. Indeed, the Defence Acquisition Procedure 2020 states that the planning process should evolve from a “National Security Strategy/Guidelines (as and when promulgated)”.

Six years later, no such strategy is visible.

Also Read: Future of India’s IBGs rests on rollout speed, tech. History rarely rewards armies that wait

The procurement cliff

Between 2004 and 2026, the Indian Navy commissioned two aircraft carriers, seven destroyers, 15 frigates and six Scorpène/Kalvari-class conventional submarines. But these inductions largely reflect decisions taken many years ago. Naval ships take a decade or more to design, approve and build; what enters service today is therefore the........

© ThePrint