Israel, Iran, and the curvature of strategic reality

As John Wheeler distilled Einstein’s general relativity: spacetime tells matter how to move, and matter tells spacetime how to curve. A century on, the metaphor has migrated from cosmology to grand strategy — and not lazily. The geometry of international politics is itself curved: by power, by fear, by the gravitational pull of a few dominant actors. The events of the past year have bent that geometry sharply enough that the world’s smaller states are now moving along new geodesics they did not choose.

For decades, Iran’s military and theological mass warped the regional manifold. Hezbollah, the Houthis, Hamas, the Iraqi militias — these were satellites in tight orbit around a heavy central body. The 2026 conflict did not merely degrade the satellites; it reduced the central mass itself. The result is that the curvature of the Middle Eastern manifold has flattened in some places and steepened sharply in others. Gulf states that had been describing constrained geodesics around Tehran are now drifting on freer trajectories. Russia has been exposed: a budget propped up by a Hormuz windfall it neither caused nor controls, defence-industrial capacity absorbed by Ukraine, and a uranium escrow proposal that functioned as revealed preference. A state benefiting from someone else’s war rather than shaping it — and offering to broker custody of fissile material it once would have backed unilaterally — is one no longer able to shape outcomes. It can only insert itself into settlements others are writing.

Consider frame dragging — the Lense-Thirring effect, by which a rotating mass drags spacetime around with it. The United States has been performing this in the........

© The Times of Israel (Blogs)