In June 2025, while the Pentagon debated whether GBU-57 massive ordnance penetrators could crack Fordow, two defense officials admitted a deep internal contention: some planners believed only a tactical nuclear weapon could destroy the site. After the White House publicly denied the option and the strike damage became visible months later, analysts concluded the operation had tested the absolute limits of conventional destruction.

The nuclear shortcut was never a fringe theory; it originated inside the building. Now the math returns amplified because Kuh-e Kolang Gaz La, Pickaxe Mountain, sits deeper than Fordow. If granite defeated America’s heaviest conventional bomb at a shallower depth, the nuclear question is unavoidable.

Following that trajectory to its end reveals a logistical dead end. The nuclear imagination is stuck in 1945, and that imagery fails twice over. Consider the mortality figures from that August: Little Boy, at fifteen kilotons, killed roughly 140,000 people in Hiroshima, or about 40 percent of the city, while the more powerful twenty-one kiloton Fat Man killed around 73,000 in Nagasaki, about 27 percent. The difference is terrain. While Hiroshima sits flat, Nagasaki is irregular and mountainous, allowing the hills to absorb what the plain transmitted.

The second lesson comes from a single structure. Virtually everyone within a five hundred meter radius of the Nagasaki detonation died, but the Nagasaki University Medical School Hospital, six hundred meters from ground zero, remained standing because of its reinforced concrete walls. Inside, 43 percent of the occupants died rather than nearly all of them, providing the only empirical evidence of a structure shielding human beings from a nuclear explosion.

Put both metrics together, and the tactical shortcut collapses. If ordinary reinforced concrete kept the majority of its occupants alive six hundred meters from a........

© The Times of Israel (Blogs)