Forgot Your Password?

New to The Nation? Subscribe

Print subscriber? Activate your online access

.nation-small__b{fill:#fff;}

Garbage In, Carnage Out

The harrowing lessons of the Pentagon’s recently dissolved partnership with Anthropic

Anthropic touts its alliance with the American imperium in happier times for the company.

It’s been a dizzying few weeks for the AI firm Anthropic. After a barrage of MAGA-led tantrums, the company  ost its $200 million contract with the Pentagon by refusing to suspend key safeguards within its operating system that protect it from manipulation by bad actors; in terminating the deal, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth claimed the AI lab posed a “supply chain risk to national security.”

But it appears that risk was short lived, at least when it comes to a new intervention in the Middle East. As the Trump administration launched its invasion of Iran, the military reportedly relied on Anthropic’s AI technology to identify targets and coordinate bombing attacks. The whole episode speaks volumes about our failure to reckon with the true scale and implications of the AI sector’s growing dominance over all facets of American life—including the fateful life-and-death decisions entrusted to the country’s military-industrial complex. As the MAGA war complex and the Silicon Valley elite battle over the finer points of Anthropic’s role in modern war-making, the larger story remains unchanged: AI overseers are enthusiastic partners in a morally disastrous campaign to insulate the most destructive decisions that military commanders make from their actual consequences. And as usual, the casualties often marked for elimination in our emerging post-human warmaking regime are powerless civilians on the ground. 

None of this has entered into the high-profile spat between Anthropic and the Department of Defense. When news of the company’s breach with the Pentagon broke, AI boosters and tech analysts embarked on a fervid round of wishcasting, depicting Anthropic and company CEO Dario Amodei as swashbuckling defenders of responsible data collection against the forces of government surveillance and repression. “Dario Amodei lost his tender with the Pentagon but the Anthropic CEO held onto his beliefs and cemented his reputation as a man of courage,” Russian dissident and former chess grandmaster Garry Kasparov wrote on his Substack, having convinced himself that the contretemps was “a story bigger than Iran.” Meanwhile, Anthropic’s AI chatbot app, Claude, shot to the top of the charts on the App Store and Google Play.

It didn’t hurt Anthropic’s case that its opponents seemed to be doing their best impressions of monologuing cartoon villains. “The Leftwing nut jobs at Anthropic have made a DISASTROUS MISTAKE trying to STRONG-ARM the Department of War,” Trump thundered on Truth Social. Undersecretary of War for Research and Engineering Emil Michael declared on X that Amodei was a “liar” with a “God-complex” who “wants nothing more than to try to personally control the US Military and is ok putting our nation’s safety at risk.”

Yet the heavy-breathing partisans on both sides of the Pentagon-Anthropic spat have fundamentally misread the tech-military alliance they think they’re describing. Before we hand Amodei the Nobel Peace Prize that Trump so desperately covets, it’s worth remembering that Anthropic isn’t some innocent tech ingenue that’s been dragged into a slap-fight with Trump and Hegseth. The $380 billion company had been an enthusiastic, voluntary participant in Trump’s war machine, signing its Pentagon contract, eyes wide open, in July 2025, long after it was abundantly clear just what Trump 2.0 was all about.

The honeymoon went sour some time in January, when the administration decided, Darth Vader-style, that it needed to alter the deal it had agreed to. Pentagon officials removed........

© The Nation