menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

Gay Dad’s Disturbing Diary Illuminates Dysfunctions Of Buying Babies

4 0
16.09.2026

1 Trending: Alito Hints Liberal Justices Slow-Walked Dissents To Stop Trump’s Elections Order For Midterms

2 Trending: Assimilation Means More Than Going To A Football Game

3 Trending: In Corrupt Milwaukee, Election Integrity Dies In Darkness

4 Trending: SCOTUS Blocks Trump’s Mail-In Voting Order Ahead Of Midterms

Gay Dad’s Disturbing Diary Illuminates Dysfunctions Of Buying Babies

The diary’s author has told us exactly what the modern family prioritizes: adult appetite over child need. We should believe him.

Share Article on Facebook

Share Article on Twitter

Share Article on Truth Social

Share Article via Email

This article contains disturbing information about adult sexual behaviors and children.

New York Magazine recently published the sex diary of a 42-year-old gay dad living outside Boston. He and his “husband,” Gavin, have an infant daughter, Sophie, who was presumably born through paid surrogacy.

At 10 a.m., Dad opens Sniffies, a location-based app used primarily by men seeking anonymous sex.

Over the next seven days, he propositions a married man who initially refuses to show his face. He has sex with that stranger on his infant daughter’s leaf-shaped play mat while her stuffed giraffe knocks against his head. He sends Gavin a photo of himself in a jockstrap, hoping he will leave work early. He ends the week having sex with a police officer at a party up against a washing machine.

One infant. Two gay men. No mother. Welcome to the post-Obergefell family.

From the adult’s side, the diary is supposed to read as naughty, funny, and liberated. From Sophie’s perspective, this isn’t a cheeky account about sexual liberation. It’s a record of her fundamental biological and developmental needs being subordinated to a sex-crazed man.

The diary runs roughly 2,300 words across a few hundred sentences. The vast majority of entries describe a sexual encounter, sexual fantasy, or attempt to arrange one, often in X-rated detail. By comparison, references to Sophie are scarce and largely administrative. And even those moments are diverted to his sexual monologue. 

While Gavin prepares her bottle, the writer is thinking about oral sex. As formula drips down Sophie’s chin, he jokes that she is obviously Gavin’s because she “eats like a troll.” At the pediatrician’s office, he notes the doctor’s genitals “swinging under his scrubs” and sexualizes the examination itself: He swears the doctor “looked at me when he put his little finger in Sophie’s mouth” to test her sucking reflex.

Even when Sophie is mentioned, she’s overshadowed by her........

© The Federalist