1 Trending: American Bar Association Keeps Proving It’s A Left-Wing Activist Group

2 Trending: Flock Cameras Are The New Patriot Act

3 Trending: Saving The United States Means Becoming Unapologetically American Again

4 Trending: 9/11 Exposed The Weakness Of A Post-Christian West

Lindsay Clancy’s Activist Jury Is A Consequence Of Democrats’ Soft-On-Crime Creep

Facts, not feelings of solidarity or sympathy, were supposed to guide the Clancy jurors as they determined her legal fate.

Share Article on Facebook

Share Article on Twitter

Share Article on Truth Social

Share Article via Email

Everyone has opinions about how the Lindsay Clancy trial, the high-profile case about a mother who strangled her three young children, should have ended, but none are more interesting and revealing than those of the jurors assigned to decide the case.

Less than one week after the judge declared a mistrial, several of the hung jury’s female members admitted to the media that the holdout vote belonged to one of the three men named to weigh the case. Another juror, Paula Devlin, stunned Gayle King when she further announced the man who refused to vote not guilty by reason of insanity is black.

Gayle King finds out the Lindsay Clancy holdout juror, who wouldn't acquit, was a black man and says, "Wow. I'll have to sit with that for a second." pic.twitter.com/CyZUjnf7YW— Eddie Scarry (@eScarry) September 11, 2026

Gayle King finds out the Lindsay Clancy holdout juror, who wouldn't acquit, was a black man and says, "Wow. I'll have to sit with that for a second." pic.twitter.com/CyZUjnf7YW

In a subsequent sitdown with CBS Saturday Morning, Devlin revealed her opinion on the Clancy case was shaped by a collective quest to “change something to make it better for other women in the future, for other families.” Devlin maintained that the jury “didn’t know what was going on outside of our little bubble” but admitted they saw their verdict as “a........

© The Federalist