1 Trending: From Iryna Zarutska To Lindsay Clancy, The Left Only Likes Women If They’re Politically Useful

2 Trending: DOJ Tells Sanctuary States They Must Report Illegals To Get Federal Welfare

3 Trending: Report: DHS Launches Voter Fraud ‘Surge’ Probes In Nine States

4 Trending: 205 House Democrats Vote To Kill Anti-Court Packing Amendment

Democrats Invite Women To Freeze Their Eggs So They Can Go Fight Wars

A new Pentagon pilot program will pay for egg and sperm freezing rather than fix the policy that puts women in harm’s way during their most fertile years.

Share Article on Facebook

Share Article on Twitter

Share Article on Truth Social

Share Article via Email

The military has announced plans to cover costs for sperm and egg freezing for service members, expanding a negligent “reproductive” effort to the detriment of military personnel and their families.

The pilot program, launching Sept. 14 under the Veteran Families Health Services Act of 2025, will run for three years and reimburse costs of sperm freezing up to $500 and egg cryopreservation up to $10,000 for service members who meet deployment or separation requirements.

The program fulfills a longtime Democrat-backed effort to disassociate military women from maternal family roles; increases dissonance in already strained military families, further divorces procreation from spousal stability, and ensures mothers can be separated from their children.

The Sexes Are Not Equal in Combat

Women have supported the armed forces in non-combat roles since the development of the Army Nurse Corps in 1901, with increased but limited access to positions until 2013. At that time, then-President Barack Obama supported a lifting of the ban by former Defense Secretary Leon Panetta. By 2016, gender specific roles in the military were effectively eliminated.

The exclusion of women from serving in combat roles has been justified. Combat poses the direct and imminent risk of injury and death, as well as placing soldiers in tactical locations that cannot adequately accommodate gender separation. Forward........

© The Federalist