Why does a four-day working week work for the City of Launceston council but trigger the public?

Subscribe now for unlimited access.

Login or signup to continue reading

The reaction to Launceston City Council's proposed four-day work week has been swift, loud and revealing. Critics warn of collapsing productivity, unfair pay rises, and a slippery slope that will drag Australian industry backwards by decades.

But beneath the economic rhetoric sits a more human question: are some people opposed because they genuinely fear worse services, or because they fear someone else is getting something they won't?

The council's proposal is straightforward. Full-time staff would work 30.4 hours across four days for the same pay, under a model already trialled internationally. Productivity targets remain unchanged. The wages bill stays capped. Ratepayers avoid steep increases. Yet opponents describe it as a 20 per cent pay rise and a threat to service delivery.

That claim wilts under scrutiny. This is not a "four-day council." Services will still run across five days, with staff rostered Monday-Thursday and Tuesday-Friday to ensure coverage. Planning desks won't sit empty on Fridays. Phones won't ring unanswered. The anxiety that residents won't receive the same service if staff work one fewer day........

© The Examiner