menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

Donald Trump’s Trickle-Down Misogyny

25 0
18.08.2026

Sign up for the Slatest to get the most insightful analysis, criticism, and advice out there, delivered to your inbox daily.

It’s perhaps not surprising that Donald Trump, a man who has many criticisms of the press and a long history of demeaning his female critics, reserves special rage for reporters who happen to be women. The latest example happened in the Oval Office yesterday, when Trump called CNN’s Kristen Holmes “a loud, boisterous person” and told her to “be quiet.” The president has attacked female journalists before, but it’s what happened next that really sets this outburst apart—and says a lot about how Trump’s misogyny is infecting the rest of his party.

What exactly led to Trump’s outburst?

Holmes, who has covered Trump for years, asked the president to respond to comments that Sen. Jon Ossoff, a Georgia Democrat, made over the weekend accusing Trump of neglecting his presidential duties by prioritizing his proposed White House ballroom and traveling with an aide named Natalie Harp (more on that later). Trump responded relatively civilly, calling Ossoff a “Pee-wee Herman look-alike” before going on a tear about the ballroom’s virtues. But later, when Holmes piggybacked on a colleague’s question about Trump wanting to scale back U.S. military drills with South Korea, the president erupted. “Quiet, quiet, quiet,” he said, pointing at Holmes and asking where she worked. “Fake news,” Trump snapped after she said CNN, raising his voice as she tried to repeat her question. “You’re a loud—you’re a loud, boisterous person. You’re fake news. Be quiet. Be quiet. Be quiet!”

Not great. But is this really different from how Trump has berated other reporters in the past?

Unfortunately, there’s more. After the Oval Office scrum, an X account run by the White House, called Rapid Response 47, twice posted about Holmes’ question about Ossoff. The first post called Holmes “a disgraceful, humiliating embarrassment to her alleged profession.” The second got more personal: “Someday, your children will come across your disgusting and inhumane question,” it read. “They will be sickened and embarrassed to have a parent be so callous and vindictive.”

That’s pretty ugly. Has there been........

© Slate