menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

Second Amendment Roundup: Viramontes Is Not Moot

1 0
yesterday

The Volokh Conspiracy

Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent

About The Volokh Conspiracy Editorial Independence Who we are Books Volokh Daily Email Archives Search DMCA RSS

Second Amendment Roundup: Viramontes Is Not Moot

Cook County includes AK-47 rifles to be among “AR-15 platform weapons”

Stephen Halbrook | 11.8.2026 10:07 PM

In the Viramontes v. Cook County case pending in the Supreme Court, Cook County has filed a Suggestion of Mootness in response to a Motion to Dismiss Petitioner Cutberto Viramontes from the case.  The question presented in the case is: "Whether the Second and Fourteenth Amendments guarantee the right to possess AR-15 platform and similar semiautomatic rifles."  Cook County argues that standing in the challenge is based on Mr. Viramontes' wish to obtain an AR-15 style rifle, but Christopher Khaya, the only other individual petitioner in the case, only wishes to obtain an AK-47 style rifle.  Mr. Khaya, the argument goes, does not have standing to litigate the question presented because he did not state he wishes to obtain an AR-15.

Yet Cook County itself previously classified the AK-47 as within the general category "AR-15 platform weapons."  The Brief for the Cook County Respondents states:

Specific firearms are outlawed under the........

© Reason.com