Cultural Difference "Cannot Be Accepted as a Reason to Mitigate" Ethiopian-Born Lawyer's Dishonesty-Related Misconduct
The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
About The Volokh Conspiracy Editorial Independence Who we are Books Volokh Daily Email Archives Search DMCA RSS
Legal Ethics
Cultural Difference "Cannot Be Accepted as a Reason to Mitigate" Ethiopian-Born Lawyer's Dishonesty-Related Misconduct
Eugene Volokh | 6.12.2026 5:27 PM
From the long (20K-word) decision of the Washington Supreme Court Thursday in In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against Feyissa, written by Justice Sheryl Gordon McCloud:
After a 12-day disciplinary hearing, a hearing officer (HO) concluded that Shakespear N. Feyissa committed six counts of misconduct. The presumptive sanction for most of those counts was disbarment…. The Disciplinary Board (Board) of the Washington State Bar Association (Bar) unanimously adopted the HO's disbarment recommendation. Feyissa appeals….
Attorney Shakespear N. Feyissa was born in Ethiopia. He immigrated to the United States at around age 17….
There's a lot going on in the case, and you can read it for yourself here. But here's one brief passage that particularly struck me:
Feyissa claims that the HO refused to consider cultural differences. But the record contradicts that assertion ….
As stated above, Feyissa's friend testified about cultural differences between Ethiopian and Western cultures relating to norms in negotiations. The witness opined that "in Ethiopia, 'If you tell a lie but everybody's happy, then you didn't do anything wrong.'"
The HO clearly did not refuse to consider this testimony or to evaluate its........
