Get Quartz in your inbox

Free daily briefing on global business news.

Can you beat the lottery? 6 cases of bulk buys, roll-downs and fraud

These lottery loopholes and cheating cases show how players, syndicates and insiders beat or rigged the system, from bulk ticket buys and roll-downs to weighted balls

A lottery is built to take in more money than it pays out. The operator sets the odds, the prize structure and the ticket price. Across millions of tickets, the house comes out ahead on average. That design holds for nearly everyone who plays. It has not held every time.

The cases in this list went after one of three weak points. The first is the math of a game's own rules. When a jackpot grows large enough, or a prize rule shifts money toward lower tiers, a ticket can briefly be worth more than it costs. The second is the machinery of the draw. That can mean ping-pong balls in a machine or software that generates numbers. The third is the honesty of the people trusted to run the game.

Those weak points produced two different kinds of story. Some players found lottery loopholes and worked them openly, inside rules that had not anticipated their approach. In one recent case, officials questioned whether the method was permitted at all. Others committed crimes. Weighting the balls in a drawing or altering draw software is fraud. The people behind those schemes were prosecuted. Each case below falls on one side of that line or sits close to it.

The six cases here are a selection of well-documented exploits, not a ranking or a complete record. They run from a 1980 drawing in Pennsylvania to a 2023 jackpot in Texas. Romanian-born economist Stefan Mandel organized a syndicate that bought a majority of the combinations in a 1992 Virginia Lottery game. Jerry Selbee, a retired convenience-store owner from Evart, Michigan, and his wife, Marge, played the roll-down rules of state games in Michigan and Massachusetts. A Toronto geostatistician spotted a pattern on Ontario scratch tickets and reported it rather than cashing in. A lottery security official rigged the draw software he was supposed to protect. A group that included the man who announced the drawings weighted the balls in a Pennsylvania game. A buyer working through courier services covered a large share of the combinations in a Lotto Texas game.

The cases also answer a common question: can you beat the lottery? In each one, the result turned on game design, money or oversight rather than luck. Each shows the gap between how a game was designed and how someone used or abused it.

Stefan Mandel's syndicate and the 1992 Virginia Lottery bulk buy

In 1992 a syndicate organized by economist Stefan Mandel bought most of the 7,059,052 possible combinations in a Virginia Lottery game and held the winning ticket. The jackpot was about $27 million.

Mandel was born in Romania and later lived in Australia. His method was to organize syndicates of investors who pooled their money to buy every possible number combination in lotteries offering large jackpots.

The Virginia game asked players to choose six numbers from a field of 44. The order of the numbers did not matter. That setup is what produces so many combinations. Each one has the same chance of being drawn. A single ticket covers just one of them. Covering the whole field means buying one ticket for each combination.

Combination coverage turns on one comparison: the size of the jackpot against the cost of buying every ticket. Usually the cost is higher. A jackpot that rolls over without a winner keeps growing,........

© Quartz