If you saw something in the sky that you genuinely could not explain—something now officially categorized as an unidentified anomalous phenomena, or UAP—would you tell your therapist or psychiatrist?

For many people, the honest answer is no. Not because they doubt their own perception, but because they worry about what might happen next. They fear being seen as unstable, having the experience reframed as a symptom, or having it documented in a way that could affect future care, employment, or credibility.

Concerns like these are not hypothetical. Peer-reviewed research has repeatedly found that individuals who report UAP sightings do not exhibit broad psychological impairment or psychopathology [7,8,9,10]. Yet the academic and clinical literature has historically interpreted such reports through frameworks emphasizing fantasy, cognitive error, or psychological instability, often without direct clinical assessment [7]. The implication has been a preconceived idea that what these people report seeing is explained by their individual characteristics as opposed to the event itself [9]. More recent patient-reported evidence documents people describing dismissal, disbelief, or self-censorship in therapy due to fear of being labeled mentally ill after talking about what they observed [6].

All of this raises an uncomfortable ethical question: What does it say about the state of mental health care if honesty itself feels risky?

For decades, UAP observations were treated as inherently suspect. In recent years, however, the U.S. government has publicly acknowledged that unidentified anomalous phenomena are real, observed events—even though many remain unexplained [3,4]. These acknowledgments come from defense, intelligence, and scientific bodies analyzing radar, infrared, and visual data, not from speculative or anecdotal sources.

This shift matters clinically. Once a phenomenon is officially recognized as real, it can no longer be dismissed as inherently implausible. Under........

© Psychology Today