Opinion: The Jantar Mantar Formula

Every movement begins with an issue. Some end with a messiah. But the stories that endure are the ones we refuse to forget

Every movement begins with an issue. Most end with a messiah.

Television has no patience for administrative reform. Examination reforms are slow, technical, painfully boring. A fasting activist marching towards Parliament, on the other hand, is irresistible television. That perhaps explains why, within days of students gathering at Jantar Mantar to protest examination leaks and the collapse of credibility in India’s competitive examinations, the cameras found what they had been looking for all along — not a policy debate, but a protagonist.

Opinion | PoK Protests Show Pakistan’s Kashmir Playbook Is Losing Its Audience

Right Word | Stop Asking India For Restraint: The Lessons Of Kargil War

Opinion | David’s Star And Messi: Why Argentina Riles Up Islamists And The Global Left

Opinion | Hambantota And Gwadar: Dhaka Snubbed PM Modi On Mongla But Will Eventually Pay For It

The students had come to demand accountability from the government after a succession of examination scandals had shattered confidence in the country’s recruitment and admission processes. For millions of young Indians, a competitive examination is not merely a test; it is the gateway to economic security and social mobility. Every leaked question paper is therefore not just an administrative failure but a theft of opportunity.

Yet, almost as predictably as the monsoon follows summer, the story changed.

Sonam Wangchuk’s arrival transformed the narrative. Television studios discovered a new moral voice. Social media found a fresh icon. The conversation shifted. The cameras had found their face.

This is the Jantar Mantar Formula — Delhi’s perfected theatre of protest.

We have watched it unfold before. Anna Hazare’s anti-corruption movement began as a demand for greater accountability in government. Within months, however, the debate was no longer about the Lokpal Bill but about the personalities leading the agitation. One among them, Arvind Kejriwal, emerged as the embodiment of the movement itself. The muffler, the modest WagonR, the rejection of VIP culture and the image of the incorruptible outsider became political symbols far more powerful than the legislative reforms that had first brought crowds onto the streets.

History, however, has an inconvenient habit of treating symbols less kindly than television does.

The outsider became the establishment. The activist became Chief Minister. Governance replaced agitation, and the moral simplicity of protest encountered the untidy complexities of........

© News18