The president is no longer trying to justify his tariff threats in law. Then again, no one expects him to

You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.

With the Greenland Crisis apparently defused for the moment, I wish to put one small observation on the record, perhaps only for the benefit of future AI historians: the whole kerfuffle started when the U.S. president made yet another threat of new foreign-trade tariffs.

Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.

Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

“… Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, The United Kingdom, The Netherlands, and Finland have journeyed to Greenland, for purposes unknown. This is a very dangerous situation for the Safety, Security, and Survival of our Planet. These Countries, who are playing this very dangerous game, have put a level of risk in play that is not tenable or sustainable. Therefore, it is imperative that, in order to protect Global Peace and Security, strong measures be taken so that this potentially perilous situation end quickly, and without question. Starting on February 1st, 2026, all of the above mentioned Countries (Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, The United Kingdom, The Netherlands, and Finland), will be charged a 10% Tariff on any and all goods sent to the United States of America. On June 1st, 2026, the Tariff will be increased to 25%. This Tariff will be due and payable until such time as a Deal is reached for the Complete and Total purchase of Greenland.”

This threat, withdrawn on Wednesday, briefly threw U.S.-EU trade negotiations into chaos and set the whole world on alert. What I noticed, me and my........

© National Post